Hi, Denis.
At the moment I'd like to connect to a Mikrotik router which
was set up as a VPN server.
>From Ubuntu and Windows I'm able to connect
using built in solutions.
If there are some differences in MS Windows VPN Server
which I should take into account when connecting
from OpenBSD client,
Hello
I have configured sshlockout. But it doesn't work properly.
Here is auth log:
root@openbsd-gw:~ # cat /var/log/authlog | grep sshlockout
Dec 4 06:37:54 openbsd-gw sshlockout[27074]: Detected ssh preauth attempt for
an invalid user, locking out 59.63.166.104
Dec 4 07:40:16 openbsd-gw
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 01:37:53PM +0900, Tuyosi T wrote:
> i install openbsd 6.2 into mac pro 2006 .
> (boot by fedora's grub )
>
> but i cannot hear sound .
>
> $ dmesg | grep audio
> audio0 at azalia0
>
> $ dmesg | grep azalia
> azalia0 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 "Intel 6321ESB HD Audio" rev
i install openbsd 6.2 into mac pro 2006 .
(boot by fedora's grub )
but i cannot hear sound .
$ dmesg | grep audio
audio0 at azalia0
$ dmesg | grep azalia
azalia0 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 "Intel 6321ESB HD Audio" rev 0x09: msi
azalia0: codecs: Realtek ALC885
audio0 at azalia0
are there any
It sounds more like some people need to get modern messaging platforms and stop
making such a big deal out of nothing.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Mikko Laine"
I've always subscribed to the idea that too much safety results in too
may idiots, and the same is true for all these "safe" programming
languages. "Oh I don't have to write any form of bounds-checking,
because the language will do it for me."
To add further insult to injury, if the language's
Hello,
I've noticed something unexpected when entering an accent character
alone (´) and then deleting it in ed(1) in xterm(1). Instead of deleting
it, it creates another character which is seen as an inverted
exclamation (?) in the font 'misc-fixed'.
How to reproduce:
$ uname -a
OpenBSD
won't help.
it does not adjust the scheduler in that way, at all
> just wondering if anyone else has tried using renice to
> de-prioritise other processes in an effort to give more cpu
> time to packet forwarding in the kernel ?
>
> While Im certain that there significant risks to system
Hello all,
just wondering if anyone else has tried using renice to
de-prioritise other processes in an effort to give more cpu
time to packet forwarding in the kernel ?
While Im certain that there significant risks to system stability
and other functionality of the system if one were to carpet
I joined a VPN network (dn42) to learn BGP and such and decided to do
so with OpenBSD, which I'm also learning. Most peers are Linux
machines and they re-use their address on each VPN tunnel as a /32. I
have been successful doing the same until I decided I needed ospf for
my internal routes.
And on top of what Theo said: rewriting stuff in "safe" languages doesn't reduce
the need for mitigations *anyway*. Nobody's rewriting all of the ports tree in
memory safe languages.
Stefan, All,
Thanks for your Response, the reason I was asking was I was experiencing
some packet loss on a sub 1Gb/s Connection, on a setup where by
I had 70vlans on one interface and these vlans were subsequently Bridged onto
another virtio Interface
I added in an additional Virtio Interface,
> As a response to this, Theo asked rhetorically "Where's ls, where's cat,
> where's grep, and where's sort?", implying that noone so far bothered to
> write implementations of even the basic unix utilities in such a
> language.
I wasn't implying. I was stating a fact. There has been no attempt
Hi,
I recently watched a recording of Theo's talk on pledge at EuroBSDCon 2017, in
which the question of memory-safe languages and their practical usefulness came
up. Specifically, someone in the audience criticized the approach taken by
OpenBSD, which (as I understand) accepts that all
nice idea. done. direct to trash.
cheers.
x9p
> On 2017-12-02, Mihai Popescu wrote:
>>> Q2xpY2sgb24gc3RpY2tlcnMuCgpodHRwczovL3d3dy5wYXJhbGxlbGxhLm9y
>>> Zy9idXkvCgpEbyB0aGUgc2FtZSBhbmQgYmUgaGFwcHku
>>
>> Man, please quit using that encoding of ASCII mail.
>> Many people told
On 12/03/17 03:23, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> The bug on Atom C2000 was solved in the new C3000 series. It was a minor bug
> anyway.
>
> I have no evidence that the management engine is part of the new chip. It is
> an expensive extension that Intel would not include for free. Besides, if
>
On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 12:59:01PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017-12-03, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> >> Just filter @protonmail.com (I have it for message-id and in-reply-to),
> >> you'll have a more pleasant > misc@-reading experience.
> >
> > I use to read lists in
OpenBSD 6.2 (GENERIC) #1: Fri Dec 1 12:00:30 CET 2017
r...@syspatch-62-i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel Celeron ("GenuineIntel" 686-class, 256KB L2 cache) 366 MHz
cpu0:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,PERF
real mem =
Hello,
is there a way to have OpenBGPD matching more than one BGP community in
a single statement?
I need to perform some actions only when 2 or more communities are
simultaneously attached to a route.
I've tried the following statements but all failed:
# syntax error
match from any community
Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> Finally, the truth behind the aggressive behaviour against me. Some of you
> cannot read protonmail posts *because* you read the list through a mail
> archive with a substandard implementation of mime encoding. Well, fuck you
> and your mail
Finally, the truth behind the aggressive behaviour against me. Some of you
cannot read protonmail posts *because* you read the list through a mail archive
with a substandard implementation of mime encoding. Well, fuck you and your
mail archive. Upgrade, or die slowly.
Sent from ProtonMail
On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 03:48:06PM +0200, Lari Rasku wrote:
> I've been thinking about getting a laptop with a Near Field Communication
> module, but I'm worried if it'll work on OpenBSD. A search through the
> mailing list archives, man pages and packages revealed only the the
> qtconnectivity
I've been thinking about getting a laptop with a Near Field
Communication module, but I'm worried if it'll work on OpenBSD. A
search through the mailing list archives, man pages and packages
revealed only the the qtconnectivity package, whose description holds
the following paragraph:
On 2017-12-03, Mihai Popescu wrote:
>> Just filter @protonmail.com (I have it for message-id and in-reply-to),
>> you'll have a more pleasant > misc@-reading experience.
>
> I use to read lists in marc.info.
> It is a little bit off topic, but I dare to ask: what combination
> Just filter @protonmail.com (I have it for message-id and in-reply-to),
> you'll have a more pleasant > misc@-reading experience.
I use to read lists in marc.info.
It is a little bit off topic, but I dare to ask: what combination are
you using, like email client and misc@ configuration( i.e,
Hi,
Are you going to use OpenBSD as a client of MS Win server using L2TP and
mschap auth?
Thanks.
On 12/3/2017 11:27 AM, Максим wrote:
> Hello,
> Where can I find any useful information about setting up a VPN client
> (PPTP or L2TP) in recent versions of OpenBSD?
> Everything I found goes about
On 2017-12-02, Mihai Popescu wrote:
>> Q2xpY2sgb24gc3RpY2tlcnMuCgpodHRwczovL3d3dy5wYXJhbGxlbGxhLm9y
>> Zy9idXkvCgpEbyB0aGUgc2FtZSBhbmQgYmUgaGFwcHku
>
> Man, please quit using that encoding of ASCII mail.
> Many people told you that is useless and it is not use by mainstream
Article on how to disable the management engine, if you have it and are afraid
of it.
http://blog.ptsecurity.com/2017/08/disabling-intel-me.html?m=1
> @openmailbox.org>
Hello,
Where can I find any useful information about setting up a VPN client
(PPTP or L2TP) in recent versions of OpenBSD?
Everything I found goes about OpenBSD version 3.8.
--
Best regards
Maxim Rodin
Well said, Ingo
--
-=[rpe]=-
The bug on Atom C2000 was solved in the new C3000 series. It was a minor bug
anyway.
I have no evidence that the management engine is part of the new chip. It is an
expensive extension that Intel would not include for free. Besides, if
available, I think I would use it!
Sent from ProtonMail
31 matches
Mail list logo