On Tue, 22 May 2018 18:13:23 -0700
"Paul B. Henson" wrote:
> If the ldap server isn't available when opensmtpd is started, it says
> it started:
>
> # /etc/rc.d/smtpd start
Then apparently you should have done
# /etc/rc.d/ldapd start
or preferably
# rcctl start ldapd
first.
So I recently converted my opensmtpd server to use ldap as the backend
for user authentication. It seems it's a bit untolerant to ldap issues?
If the ldap server isn't available when opensmtpd is started, it says it
started:
# /etc/rc.d/smtpd start
smtpd(ok)
But it isn't there:
# ps -aux |
Regardless of which routing protocol I use, I run into the same problem.
I can't find a way to configure this on OpenBSD. Is this such an exotic
set-up?
On 2018-05-21 22:23, Raul Miller wrote:
I would try OpenOSPFD for this situation, instead of OpenBGPD.
Hi misc@,
I'm trying to bridge a VLAN between two routers with a vxlan(4) interface.
Setup:
router 1 (6.3):
physical interface (em) - vlan (with IP address) - bridge - vxlan
The two routers are connected directly, the traffic is encrypted with IPSec
and encapsulated in etherip(4), routed
On Tue, 22 May 2018 06:04:57 +0300
IL Ka wrote:
> I am definitely not an expert in this field, but here are some
> thoughts:
Exactly. There is always more than one way to skin a cat. I'm not
looking for a perfectly spelled out "solution" I must follow to the
letter.
>
Well, this problem just magically went away, and all I did was complain
about it here and run syspatch and fw_update regularly. Are there
any chances that someone fixed it? Or should I attribute this problem
and its solution to something else other than OpenBSD? I looked at
the changelog from
Not sure I quite understand this setup. Why redirect over port 9222 on the
client—can’t you just do “pass in … rdr-to 192.168.6.1 port ssh” on the server?
That said, I do believe you’ll need NAT on the server, because it’s now
masquerading its own 192.168.5.0/24 network as well as the
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 07:56:31AM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 06:49:25PM -0400, Ken M wrote:
> > Been looking around and can't find the answer to this question. If I missed
> > it
> > in some obvious place please excuse me.
> >
> > Anyway I am curious if sndio can
On 2018-05-20, Patrick Dohman wrote:
> It appears there is an errata effecting Avoton and Rangeley products.
>
> AVR54:
>
> “System May Experience Inability to Boot or May Cease Operation Problem:
> The SoC LPC_CLKOUT0 and/or LPC_CLKOUT1 signals (Low Pin Count bus clock
On 2018-05-21, Peter Hessler wrote:
> i386 and amd64 are different platforms, so of course you get different
> packages.
>
> Within the same platform, all binaries that are built should run on all
> possible members of that platform.
>
> So, code will be compiled WITHOUT AVX
Hi Peter,
please check the threads on the b...@openbsd.org mailing list. The patch
posted by Martin Pieuchot seemst to help. Its running on my hosts for
5 days without any hiccup.
Hope this helps
Harri
On Mon, 21 May 2018, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 12:29:13PM +0200, Markus Hennecke wrote:
>
> > I tried updating my HPPA box from 6.2 to 6.3, but when booting the release
> > or -current bsd.rd kernel the keyboard repeats the last key pressed. The
> > 6.2 release did not
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 06:35:17AM +0300, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> For younger UNIX users, the real reason is technical limits of hardware then.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punched_card#IBM_80-column_punched_card_format_and_character_codes
>
13 matches
Mail list logo