Re: Selling things through the mailing list allowed? I have compatible THIN CLIENTS for Firewall / Router appliance use Available

2018-08-29 Thread Bogdan Kulbida
I love it! Damn f.. asshole! Get him out of here! On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 21:09 Theo de Raadt wrote: > Jacqueline Jolicoeur wrote: > > > > Finally, whether intended or not, your intention to try to SELL > > > something on this list is extraordinarily rude. Move on and go learn > > > about this

Re: Selling things through the mailing list allowed? I have compatible THIN CLIENTS for Firewall / Router appliance use Available

2018-08-29 Thread Theo de Raadt
Jacqueline Jolicoeur wrote: > > Finally, whether intended or not, your intention to try to SELL > > something on this list is extraordinarily rude. Move on and go learn > > about this on your own. The Internet is filled with useful information. > > The mailing list archives also have a

Re: PCEngines APU4B4 doesn't boot AMD64 when PXE is activated in the bios

2018-08-29 Thread Arnaud BRAND
I stand corrected. Chris, you are right. My humble apologies. The boot.conf file had wrong file encoding. boot tftp:/bsd.rd was used, but not the stty and set tty com0 bits before. This resulted into exactly what you described. I could double check the same behavior on the USB key AMD64 boot

Re: Can't Log In, New Installation

2018-08-29 Thread Jacqueline Jolicoeur
> How can I log in or bypass the login prompt? https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#LostPW

Re: PCEngines APU4B4 doesn't boot AMD64 when PXE is activated in the bios

2018-08-29 Thread Arnaud BRAND
Sorry, no. If you forget this, the board won't reboot, it just won't show what it is doing. Also, this was done (set in the tftp boot.conf). I can replicate at will just by swapping between i386 and amd64 pxeboot and bsd.rd files on the tftp server, without touching anything else (leaving

Re: PCEngines APU4B4 doesn't boot AMD64 when PXE is activated in the bios

2018-08-29 Thread Chris Cappuccio
Chris Cappuccio [ch...@nmedia.net] wrote: > This sounds exactly like what happens when you don't do this at the > boot> prompt: > > stty com0 115220 stty com0 115200 of course

Re: PCEngines APU4B4 doesn't boot AMD64 when PXE is activated in the bios

2018-08-29 Thread Chris Cappuccio
This sounds exactly like what happens when you don't do this at the boot> prompt: stty com0 115220 set tty com0 Arnaud BRAND [arnaud.brand--o...@tib.cc] wrote: > Good evening list, > > I recently bought a PCEngine APU4B4 https://www.pcengines.ch/apu4b4.htm > AMD GX-412TC, 1 GHz quad Jaguar core

Re: Can't Log In, New Installation

2018-08-29 Thread Gianguido Sorà
Try the "root" user. The password should be the one you selected during the setup process. On Thu, Aug 30, 2018, 1:15 AM Heaven Hodges wrote: > I'm a new OpenBSD user. I've installed it as a guest OS in gnome-boxes > (host OS is Debian Stretch). I chose to not create a user account, but I >

Can't Log In, New Installation

2018-08-29 Thread Heaven Hodges
I'm a new OpenBSD user. I've installed it as a guest OS in gnome-boxes (host OS is Debian Stretch). I chose to not create a user account, but I did input a password. When OpenBSD starts up, I'm presented with a login prompt. I have no idea what the login is. How can I log in or bypass the

PCEngines APU4B4 doesn't boot AMD64 when PXE is activated in the bios

2018-08-29 Thread Arnaud BRAND
Good evening list, I recently bought a PCEngine APU4B4 https://www.pcengines.ch/apu4b4.htm AMD GX-412TC, 1 GHz quad Jaguar core / 64 bit and AES-NI / 4GB RAM I had absolutely no problem booting and installing i386 OpenBSD 6.3 and snapshots over PXE. With the AMD64 version, it wouldn't boot, it

Re: Selling things through the mailing list allowed? I have compatible THIN CLIENTS for Firewall / Router appliance use Available

2018-08-29 Thread Jacqueline Jolicoeur
> Finally, whether intended or not, your intention to try to SELL > something on this list is extraordinarily rude. Move on and go learn > about this on your own. The Internet is filled with useful information. > The mailing list archives also have a tremendous amount of useful info. Asking

Re: Selling things through the mailing list allowed? I have compatible THIN CLIENTS for Firewall / Router appliance use Available

2018-08-29 Thread Chris Bennett
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:09:39PM +, Z Ero wrote: > Hi Stuart, > > Thanks for the respectful reply. I am a little bewildered by the > degree of unwarranted hostility the original post met, but whatever, > when in Rome... I believe as of now most commercially available small > business or

Re: DNS (UNBOUND) + PF ISSUE

2018-08-29 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018-08-29, NN wrote: > Hi, > > All is working for me with new ACL Rule: > >     access-control: 0.0.0.0/0 allow > > Many Thanks Solène Rapenne ! > > ISSUE is closed. > > P.S. > > Why opening unbound to the internet is a bad idea ??? Because your resolver *will* be found and quite likely

Re: Has anyone got OpenBSD Arm to run on the Marvel Espresso Bin?

2018-08-29 Thread Z Ero
How about in August? Is it supported now? Thanks On 3/28/18, Patrick Harper wrote: > Armada 3700LP chipset not supported at present. > > -- > Patrick Harper > paia...@fastmail.com > > On Sun, 25 Mar 2018, at 22:11, Z Ero wrote: >> If yes is the on board ethernet switch supported? What wifi

Re: Selling things through the mailing list allowed? I have compatible THIN CLIENTS for Firewall / Router appliance use Available

2018-08-29 Thread Z Ero
Hi Stuart, Thanks for the respectful reply. I am a little bewildered by the degree of unwarranted hostility the original post met, but whatever, when in Rome... I believe as of now most commercially available small business or home LAN routers / WAN gateways are 32 bit MIPS or ARM based (as

Re: BFD Status ?

2018-08-29 Thread Peter Hessler
On 2018 Aug 29 (Wed) at 18:05:50 +0200 (+0200), Arnaud BRAND wrote: :Hello, : :I read Peter's presentation from BSDCan 2016 about BFD on OpenBSD. :I could not find anything by googling. :I looked at the codeand it seems to be there, albeit subjected to the BFD :kernel option. : :Does it mean that

BFD Status ?

2018-08-29 Thread Arnaud BRAND
Hello, I read Peter's presentation from BSDCan 2016 about BFD on OpenBSD. I could not find anything by googling. I looked at the codeand it seems to be there, albeit subjected to the BFD kernel option. Does it mean that the feature is not production ready yet ? How can I try it or help

Re: sbcl vs uvm

2018-08-29 Thread Manuel Giraud
Gregor Best writes: > that looks like a stack space exhaustion. I've had something similar > while compiling > OCaml's merlin package. I solved it with the brutest of forces by adding > > :stacksize=infinity:\ Thank you for the hint but this does not work for sbcl (w/ thread)

Re: DNS (UNBOUND) + PF ISSUE

2018-08-29 Thread NN
Hi, All is working for me with new ACL Rule:     access-control: 0.0.0.0/0 allow Many Thanks Solène Rapenne ! ISSUE is closed. P.S. Why opening unbound to the internet is a bad idea ??? Thx. On 08/29/18 12:51, Solène Rapenne wrote: Le 2018-08-29 12:41, NN a écrit : Hi, many thanks for

Re: DNS (UNBOUND) + PF ISSUE

2018-08-29 Thread Arnaud BRAND
Le 2018-08-29 11:57, NN a écrit : *Hi all,* *Its my first topic here =) * *Please help me investigate DNS+PF issue. ** * *I have 2 VM on OpenBSD 6.3:* *    VM#1 - Router with PF, IP:192.168.50.1* *    VM#2 - DNS (as unbound), IP:192.168.50.2** * *here is my pf.conf on VM#1:*     int_if="{

Re: sbcl vs uvm

2018-08-29 Thread Gregor Best
Hi Manuel, > [...] > trap [sbcl]46252/177072 type 6: sp 2f76e78b8 not inside 2f74f8000-2f76e8000 > [...] that looks like a stack space exhaustion. I've had something similar while compiling OCaml's merlin package. I solved it with the brutest of forces by adding :stacksize=infinity:\

Re: DNS (UNBOUND) + PF ISSUE

2018-08-29 Thread Solène Rapenne
Le 2018-08-29 12:41, NN a écrit : Hi, many thanks for your quick answer, I try to  use your PF rule, and got the same answer from my DNS:     ...     >> WARNING: recursion requested but not available     ... I need the DNS request RULE's for my PF Any ideas? BR deface On 08/29/18 12:34,

Re: DNS (UNBOUND) + PF ISSUE

2018-08-29 Thread NN
Hi, many thanks for your quick answer, I try to  use your PF rule, and got the same answer from my DNS:     ...     >> WARNING: recursion requested but not available     ... I need the DNS request RULE's for my PF Any ideas? BR deface On 08/29/18 12:34, Arnaud BRAND wrote: Le 2018-08-29

DNS (UNBOUND) + PF ISSUE

2018-08-29 Thread NN
*Hi all,* *Its my first topic here =) * *Please help me investigate DNS+PF issue. ** * *I have 2 VM on OpenBSD 6.3:* *    VM#1 - Router with PF, IP:192.168.50.1* *    VM#2 - DNS (as unbound), IP:192.168.50.2** * *here is my pf.conf on VM#1:*     int_if="{ vether0 re0 }"     set

sbcl vs uvm

2018-08-29 Thread Manuel Giraud
Hi, I used to build current sbcl (common lisp compiler) with threads support on -current amd64. For maybe 2/3 month, it does not compile anymore. On sbcl self test for threads, I get the following strange dmesg entry: trap [sbcl]46252/177072 type 6: sp 2f76e78b8 not inside 2f74f8000-2f76e8000

Re: Need an advice: Raspberry Pi3 B+ or Pine64 ROCK64

2018-08-29 Thread Joseph Mayer
On August 28, 2018 3:04 AM, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote: > On 28 August 2018 at 05:26, Joseph Mayer joseph.ma...@protonmail.com wrote: > > > Joel, > > Are you saying you gave up on using the PCIe at all? > > There's a 4-lane PCIe connector on the Rock64 right, aren't those > > dedicated lanes,