Re: How to synchronise 2 spamd instances

On Mon, Apr 22, 2019, 10:43 AM Thuban, wrote: > * Otto Moerbeek le [21-04-2019 12:49:07 +0200]: > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 09:53:52AM +, Mik J wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > I read the man but it's not so clear to me > > > https://man.openbsd.org/spamd#SYNCHRONISATION > > > a) I chose

crash report

Hi. I am having laptop crashes, but sendbug hangs so am using email directly. Some web page on bug reports, iirc, suggested emailing misc@ first to see if the email is OK, before sending to bugs@.., so I am sending here for feedback. Sendbug (per pstree) appears to hang in usbdevs -v. (Related

Re: eBGP routes are not reannounced

Well it didn't work that's why I asked the question. >From what I'm used to do with BGP it's not a redistribution it's the same BGP >table. Regards Le lundi 22 avril 2019 à 20:24:49 UTC+2, Denis Fondras a écrit : > I don't understand how to use "allow from group" > Sorry, I

Re: eBGP routes are not reannounced

> I don't understand how to use "allow from group" > Sorry, I responded too fast. You already receive the prefixes from $spamASN and you want to redistribute them. There is no filtering in the (old) versions you use IIRC. > Yes I use 6.0, 6.1 and 5.8 on these machines. I'm waiting for 6.5 to

Re: eBGP routes are not reannounced

Hello Denis, Tom, Merci/Thank you for your answers. I don't understand how to use "allow from group" Yes I use 6.0, 6.1 and 5.8 on these machines. I'm waiting for 6.5 to be released and try to migrate them all. I'm used to configure Cisco devices and there's no filtering. Routes received by

Re: eBGP routes are not reannounced

Hi Mik, 1) what version of OpenBSD / OpenBGPD are you running... 2) if it is >6.4 OpenBSD / OpenBGPD then Claudio et all have implemented a new RFC for eBGP (cant remember the number) TLDR version of the new eBGP RFC is that unfiltered bgp will by default, deny any announcements and only

Re: How to synchronise 2 spamd instances

* Otto Moerbeek le [21-04-2019 12:49:07 +0200]: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 09:53:52AM +, Mik J wrote: > > > Hello, > > I read the man but it's not so clear to me > > https://man.openbsd.org/spamd#SYNCHRONISATION > > a) I chose unicast synchronisation but I don't know which port should I > >

Re: eBGP routes are not reannounced

On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 10:07:52AM +, Mik J wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to set up openbgpd. > > On site 2, I'm peering with us.bgp-spamd.net and eu.bgp-spamd.net sucessfully. > The problem is that these routes are not in the bgp table on site 3. The BGP > peerings are up. > From site 3 I

eBGP routes are not reannounced

Hello, I'm trying to set up openbgpd. On site 2, I'm peering with us.bgp-spamd.net and eu.bgp-spamd.net sucessfully. The problem is that these routes are not in the bgp table on site 3. The BGP peerings are up. >From site 3 I can ping 192.0.2.2/site 2. I sucessfully receive prefixes >announced

Re: How to synchronise 2 spamd instances

Hello Otto, Thank you for your answer. I'm working on it right now. Regards Le dimanche 21 avril 2019 à 12:50:08 UTC+2, Otto Moerbeek a écrit : On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 09:53:52AM +, Mik J wrote: > Hello, > I read the man but it's not so clear to me >