On Tue, 29 Oct 2019, Guild Navigator wrote:
> Program prints first two strings directly.
> But it does not print the third string (1st array string).
>
> And debugging says why.
> The address of msg1 and msg2 is not stored correctly in the array.
> So when I access the address of msg1 from the
Will Theo de Raadt and other OpenBSD developer answer this topic (
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=157234932505571=2)?
Hi,
I was debugging the OpenBSD kernel using Qemu and gdb.
Well, it depends on the task. You can follow the below link if it suits to
you and sees if it works for you.
http://bijanebrahimi.github.io/blog/remote-debugging-the-running-openbsd-kernel.html
In my case, I was debugging pledge(2) and
Hello,
Hiltjo Posthuma [2019-10-29 23:15:56 +0100]:
> You can actually do it in httpd.conf.
>
> This will give a syntax error (httpd -n):
>
> "text/plain; charset=utf-8" txt
>
> Using quoting will work:
>
> "text"/"plain; charset=utf-8" txt
Thank you, this indeed works,
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 08:41:54PM +0100, Bertalan Zoltán Péter wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a working httpd server behind a relayd reverse proxy.
>
> Recently I wanted to host some simple text files in a directory that
> contained UTF-8 characters. Unfortunately, I noticed that when opened
> from
Hello,
I have a working httpd server behind a relayd reverse proxy.
Recently I wanted to host some simple text files in a directory that
contained UTF-8 characters. Unfortunately, I noticed that when opened
from a browser, say iridium, these documents render with incorrect
encoding and are
On Sun, 27 Oct 2019 21:29:41 -0700
Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
> On 2019-10-27 17:29, Chris Narkiewicz wrote:
> > Rspamd stop rc script doesn't work in OpenBSD 6.6.
> >
> > 1. Fresh OpenBSD 6.6 installation
> > 2. pkg_add rspamd
> > 3. rcctl start rspamd
> >
> > Works.
> >
> > 4. rcctl stop rspamd
Hi,
I was wondering how you guys debug your kernel?
Are you doing some vmd(8) voodoo ?
Recompiling every time you think you've found the error gets quite
exhausting over time.
g,
Stephan
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 09:16:42PM +0100, Jurjen Oskam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using VMware ESXi (currently on 6.7 Update 3) to try things out before
> running it on bare metal hardware. I've been doing this for a few release
> cycles now. With the release of 6.6 I've encountered a phenomenon I
>
Hi,
I'm using VMware ESXi (currently on 6.7 Update 3) to try things out before
running it on bare metal hardware. I've been doing this for a few release
cycles now. With the release of 6.6 I've encountered a phenomenon I
haven't seen before.
After the VM is installed, there is a high probability
On 10/29/2019 1:17 PM, Nathan Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 7:41 AM Clark Block wrote:
>
>> Just as most programmers today warn people not to use assembler, probably
>> future programmers will warn people not to use high-level programming
>> languages.
>
>
> In the future, computers
Anthony J. Bentley [2019-09-29 23:17:06 -0600]:
> I don't claim to understand all of openssl's output, but when I try
> it on my certs I get various CNs that I don't expect either, even
> though I'm quite confident the certificate has a valid hostname.
Hi,
Thanks for your reply. Since then I
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 7:41 AM Clark Block wrote:
> Just as most programmers today warn people not to use assembler, probably
> future programmers will warn people not to use high-level programming
> languages.
In the future, computers will program programmers.
Guild Navigator wrote:
> But what would be the OpenBSD correct way to
> write such simple print-from-the-array-of-strings program?
printf
No. I am using amd64.
Which is really obvious from the register usage in the program.
Program prints first two strings directly.
But it does not print the third string (1st array string).
And debugging says why.
The address of msg1 and msg2 is not stored correctly in the array.
So when I access
Does not work how? Are you using i386?
2019-10-29 13:50 GMT+01:00, Guild Navigator :
> # as why.asm -o why.o
> # ld why.o -e start -static -o why
>
> .global start
>
> .equ SYS_EXIT, 0x01
> .equ SYS_WRITE, 0x04
> .equ STD_OUT, 0x01
>
> # this example works in linux (with changed syscalls)
> #
We have changed the ABI. Pray we do not change it further.
Guild Navigator wrote:
> # as why.asm -o why.o
> # ld why.o -e start -static -o why
>
> .global start
>
> .equ SYS_EXIT, 0x01
> .equ SYS_WRITE, 0x04
> .equ STD_OUT, 0x01
>
> # this example works in linux (with changed syscalls)
> #
On 2019-10-28, Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> After upgrading a OpenBSD host running 6.5 to 6.6 using sysupgrade(8), I
> received the email below.
> It suggests that the upgrade has been aborted upon failure to upgrade
> comp66.tgz. This set was not part of the initial installation.
>
On 2019-10-29, PJ wrote:
> Am 28.10.19 um 23:52 schrieb Stuart Henderson:
>> On 2019-10-28, Andy Lemin wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> Does anyone know if it is possible to completely disable ftp in the package
>>> management utilities; pkg_add, syspatch, sysupgrade etc?
>>>
>>> My PKG_PATH
# as why.asm -o why.o
# ld why.o -e start -static -o why
.global start
.equ SYS_EXIT, 0x01
.equ SYS_WRITE, 0x04
.equ STD_OUT, 0x01
# this example works in linux (with changed syscalls)
# also in netbsd, but not in openbsd. why?
.macro sys
syscall
.endm
.text
start:
# print first message
leaq
Hi!
Just as most programmers today warn people not to use assembler, probably
future programmers will warn people not to use high-level programming
languages.
It is written in book Java How to Program ninth edition that instead of
using the strings of numbers that computers could directly
Hi all
Some changes in VLAN-related code went into 6.6 and I think some of them
changed the way the parent interface gets into promiscuous mode. Let me
try to explain...
Our ISP provides internet and VoIP over two separate VLANs (100 and 101,
respectively). Our external firewall has two
Your disk layout is strange, an EFI partition is typically initialised by a GPT
disk, not MBR.
GPT has a number of advantages including no differentiation between primary and
extended partitions, and beating the 2TB limit of MBR.
When created, GPT also creates a 'protective MBR' covering the
Thanks. I used partition cloning software recently. I'll fix it
вт, 29 окт. 2019 г., 14:10 Peter Kay :
> Your disk layout is strange, an EFI partition is typically initialised by
> a GPT disk, not MBR.
>
>
> GPT has a number of advantages including no differentiation between
> primary and
In article <20191028083820.ga43...@nausicaa.home> Marc Espie
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 05:35:27PM +, flauenroth wrote:
> > Apparently not just theo is using fvwm after all. :)
>
> Considering all the people using it, it would be great if someone were to
> look at the enhancements of
Am 28.10.19 um 23:52 schrieb Stuart Henderson:
> On 2019-10-28, Andy Lemin wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Does anyone know if it is possible to completely disable ftp in the package
>> management utilities; pkg_add, syspatch, sysupgrade etc?
>>
>> My PKG_PATH references http:// urls, as does
dmitry.sensei writes:
> Why offset in disklabel for a partition is different from fdisk output?
> 423202816 and 433358194
Something wrote the MBR and/or disklabel incorrectly. Probably a
repartitioning or other data shuffling process gone wrong.
> When I add label for partition 3 as in fdisk
Hi!.
In my opinion disklabel and fdisk whow very different information.
Why offset in disklabel for a partition is different from fdisk output?
423202816 and 433358194
When I add label for partition 3 as in fdisk output i get overlapping error.
disklabel
# /dev/rsd0c:
total sectors:
28 matches
Mail list logo
