[not subscribed, please Cc, thanks.]
> Hi,
Haai,
"Ingo Schwarze" wrote:
> just FYI:
>
> zeurk...@volny.cz wrote on Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 08:10:10PM +0100:
>> jmc@ wrote:
>
>>> Dq produces "", so use either Dq or "".
>
>> Medoes it for consistency with cases like:
>>
>> .Vt "struct blaat" Va
On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 8:14 PM Raymond, David
wrote:
> Openmpi uses readv/writev. I am beginning to think that the timeout
> and permission errors are legit and reflect real conditions. What
does re do when it receives a write request when it is busy?
>
're' does not expose a device, but
Openmpi uses readv/writev. I am beginning to think that the timeout
and permission errors are legit and reflect real conditions. What
does re do when it receives a write request when it is busy?
I am having some luck in redoing writev calls when needed, though
there are still some problems.
Thank you for the suggestion. It seems to have fixed my issue.
I added the following to my ~/.profile with this minor correction
(closing double parenthesis):
alias chrome='ulimit -d $((3*1024*1024)); /usr/local/bin/chrome'
alias firefox='ulimit -d $((3*1024*1024)); /usr/local/bin/firefox'
Best
Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> Just want to document in the case people are searching for this. OpenBSD
> 6.6 has no problems booting of the USB and running on Ubiquiti
> EdgeRouter 4 (tested only USB installation as I didn't want to nuke 4GB
> eMMC flash storage). However, in spite of having
>
>
Hi,
just FYI:
zeurk...@volny.cz wrote on Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 08:10:10PM +0100:
> jmc@ wrote:
>> Dq produces "", so use either Dq or "".
> Medoes it for consistency with cases like:
>
> .Vt "struct blaat" Va scaahp Ns Ic ";"
>
> where the quotes are part of the invocation syntax.
Not
Hi,
Hiltjo Posthuma wrote on Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 12:40:14AM +0100:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 02:03:19PM -0700, andrej wrote:
>> On the note of accurate documentation; how about adding the actually
>> defined timeout for persist rather than the "some time"?
> Sometimes there is a reason
Are you browsers allowed enough memory?
Someone on this list once suggested putting lines like these in ~/.kshrc
# Raising the memory limits to accommodate greedy browsers 3Gb
alias chrome='(ulimit -d $((3*1024*1024); /usr/local/bin/chrome'
alias firefox='(ulimit -d $((3*1024*1024);
Hello, my systems freezes almost anytime I run
Chrome/Firefox/Qutebrowser and visit any site that contains some soft
of scripting, or if I move the mouse somewhat to fast. But I think it
is more when there is a lot of computation involved by the browser.
When the system freezes, it is
Hi Theo,
Theo de Raadt wrote on Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 11:11:41AM -0700:
> Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> +.Pp
>> +The driver of the device that is being read from
>> +may return additional errors.
>> +Such device-specific errors may be documented
>> +in the section 4 manual pages of the respective
On 2019-12-24, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2019-12-22, Stuart Longland wrote:
>> On 23/12/19 4:03 am, Strahil Nikolov wrote:
>>> did anyone try to install openBSD on Raspberry Pi 4B ?
>>> I know it's not supported , but maybe it does work :)
>
> Some of the devices on rpi4 don't yet have driver
On 2019-12-22, Stuart Longland wrote:
> On 23/12/19 4:03 am, Strahil Nikolov wrote:
>> did anyone try to install openBSD on Raspberry Pi 4B ?
>> I know it's not supported , but maybe it does work :)
Some of the devices on rpi4 don't yet have driver support.
Notably:
- ethernet
- PCIE (the USB
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 10:42:47PM +, rgci...@disroot.org wrote:
December 24, 2019 4:42 AM, "Dumitru Moldovan" wrote:
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 10:56:20AM +1000, Stuart Longland wrote:
So, a few years ago now, I deployed a router VM with OpenBSD 6.1 AMD64.
Later that got updated to 6.2,
I am having trouble viewing an HTML message. Nail natively seems to work with
simple HTML messages that I create and email to myself. However commercially
created emails with multi-part doesn't render in lynx.
I have nail version v14.9.15, 2019-08-17 (built for OpenBSD) and I am working
through
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 08:17:37AM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 5:04 AM Raymond, David
> wrote:
>
> > The "timeout" error was numerically 60. Curiously, boards with RTL
> > 8111GR chips did not produce these errors, but those with RTL 8111H
> > chips did.
15 matches
Mail list logo
