Re: Ports: how to install dependencies from binaries?

On 8/4/20 1:29 pm, Daniel Jakots wrote: > https://man.openbsd.org/bsd.port.mk#FETCH_PACKAGES but it doesn't work > very reliably, sadly. Many thanks Daniel and Raf, must've missed seeing that. I'll give it a shot and see how we go. Even if it works 30% of the time, it should speed things up a

Re: Ports: how to install dependencies from binaries?

On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 04:12:54AM BST, Stuart Longland wrote: > Hi all, > > Silly question… how do you install the dependencies of a port from > binaries automatically? > > Situation is this: I'm wanting to add OPUS support to Asterisk as I have > an ATA that supports this CODEC, it'd nice to

Re: Ports: how to install dependencies from binaries?

On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 13:12:54 +1000, Stuart Longland wrote: > Silly question… how do you install the dependencies of a port from > binaries automatically? https://man.openbsd.org/bsd.port.mk#FETCH_PACKAGES but it doesn't work very reliably, sadly. Cheers, Daniel

Ports: how to install dependencies from binaries?

Hi all, Silly question… how do you install the dependencies of a port from binaries automatically? Situation is this: I'm wanting to add OPUS support to Asterisk as I have an ATA that supports this CODEC, it'd nice to be able to transcode this to other formats. I have a work-in-progress patch

Re: opensmtpd updates not in OPENBSD_6_6 branch?

Daniel Jakots wrote: > On Tue, 07 Apr 2020 19:05:31 + (UTC), Chris Ross > wrote: > > > Hello all. I am running a OpenBSD 6.6 that I installed late last > > year. I was recently trying to make sure I'd updated my smtpd to > > 6.6.4, based on earlier security announcement. As I'm running

Re: [/ is full] How to delete junk in /dev ?

Sometimes I have made the mistake of dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sd2c - instead of dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rsd2c - or worse dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdc. These kind of errors have filled /dev (or ultimately /) Play over from my Linux days. -Original Message- From: owner-m...@openbsd.org On

Re: opensmtpd updates not in OPENBSD_6_6 branch?

On Tue, 07 Apr 2020 19:05:31 + (UTC), Chris Ross wrote: > Hello all. I am running a OpenBSD 6.6 that I installed late last > year. I was recently trying to make sure I'd updated my smtpd to > 6.6.4, based on earlier security announcement. As I'm running on a > sparc64, syspatch doesn't

opensmtpd updates not in OPENBSD_6_6 branch?

Hello all. I am running a OpenBSD 6.6 that I installed late last year. I was recently trying to make sure I'd updated my smtpd to 6.6.4, based on earlier security announcement. As I'm running on a sparc64, syspatch doesn't work. While I'd love to talk about rectifying that, that's a bigger

Re: OpenBSD/sparc64 6.7-beta not working on silver Blade 2500

Well, that definately looks like the filesystem blowing up. Installing bsd.rd 100% |**| 8560 KB00:00 Installing base67.tgz66% |* | 113 MB 00:17 ETAftp: Reading from file: Input/output error gzip: stdin: Input/output error tar: End

OpenBSD/sparc64 6.7-beta not working on silver Blade 2500

Hello misc@, while testing the FFS2 patches by otto@ I noticed that I was unable to install -current on my silver Blade 2500. tar fails while unpacking the sets, although the files are ok, if I rename base67.tgz to base66.tgz to fool the 6.6 installer I can install 6.7-beta, although it

Re: macpcc sysupgrade missing files

There is a problem with some of the mirrors. It is being looked into. rgc wrote: > misc@ > > was trying to sysupgrade to latest snapshot but got this > > rgc:/home/rgc:94$ doas sysupgrade -kn > Fetching from http://ftp.jaist.ac.jp/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/macppc/ > SHA256.sig 100% >

macpcc sysupgrade missing files

misc@ was trying to sysupgrade to latest snapshot but got this rgc:/home/rgc:94$ doas sysupgrade -kn Fetching from http://ftp.jaist.ac.jp/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/macppc/ SHA256.sig 100%

Re: news from my hacked box

> I understand you perfectly but there are some points I want highlight: > Then there is a huge number of hacked site and hackaed desktop out there. > Many people > didn't know that their pc or phone is not under their control anymore. > The new frontier of hacking is espionage. None want be

Re: ssh-agent confirmation for use by default

On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 12:48:34PM -, Stuart Henderson wrote: | > After a discussion at work, I started looking at enabling confirmation | > before authentication through ssh-agent by default. When logging in | > through xdm, the default Xsession runs `ssh-add < /dev/null` (see line | > 36 in

Re: ssh-agent confirmation for use by default

On 2020-04-06, Paul de Weerd wrote: > Hi all, > > After a discussion at work, I started looking at enabling confirmation > before authentication through ssh-agent by default. When logging in > through xdm, the default Xsession runs `ssh-add < /dev/null` (see line > 36 in /etc/X11/xdm/Xsession).