Hi Misc,
I have a very noob question. Is it possible to configure OpenSMTP to use
multiple relay servers?
I would like to be able to do the following.
mail -r someb...@gmail.com miscATopenbsd
should relay through smtp.gmail.com
mail -r someb...@hotmail.com miscATopenbsd
should relay through
I was halfway there.
That's an old bug.
Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 5:08 PM Zé Loff wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 03:51:58PM -0700, Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
> > > I'm working on a simple awk snippet to convert the IP range data listed
> > in
> > > the Extended
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 5:08 PM Zé Loff wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 03:51:58PM -0700, Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
> > I'm working on a simple awk snippet to convert the IP range data listed
> in
> > the Extended Delegation Statistics data from ARIN [1] and convert it into
> > CIDR blocks. I have
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 03:51:58PM -0700, Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was hoping the fine folks here could give me a quick sanity check, I'm by
> no means an awk guru, so I'm likely missing something obvious. I wanted to
> ask here quickly before I started flapping my gums on bugs@.
>
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 11:57 AM Jan Stary wrote:
> This is current/amd64 on an APU2.
> The egress is XDSL pppoe(4) over vlan(4) over em(4),
>
> ...
>
> Are people having the same problem?
> Are you doing something about the late ifconfig?
>
I have some routers that connect to DSL using pppoe(4)
Start address this problem to your ISP and ask it to remedy this stupid
implementation of pppoe on server side. Otherwise, you have to wait for it
and avoid spamming the list with your "i need to get this done quickly"
messages, please. Maybe it is time to employ a real expert on OpenBSD.
Thank
Hello,
I was hoping the fine folks here could give me a quick sanity check, I'm
by no means an awk guru, so I'm likely missing something obvious. I
wanted to ask here quickly before I started flapping my gums on bugs@.
I'm working on a simple awk snippet to convert the IP range data listed
On 2020-06-06, Todd C Miller wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Jun 2020 19:14:28 +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
>
>> Is the aim to let the ISP know that the iface is down,
>> so that it gets set up afresh on boot, as opposed to
>> waiting for some PPP keep-alive timeout?
>
> Basically. It is to work around an issue
On Jun 06 22:01:14, maillists.rul...@mailbox.org wrote:
> > None of the clients gets more than cca 1.5MB/s from that, alone.
> > Is that to be expected with 11g? (Not that I expect the 54 Mbit/s)
>
> I faced the same problem with my new APU2 just yesterday and found
> more info here:
Judging by the dmesg there is at least one unoccupied PCIe slot that could
accommodate an adapter such as a Silverstone ECWA2-LITE.
This would allow you to use Mini-PCIe cards that normally go in laptops,
including all of the iwm(4) devices.
--
Patrick Harper
paia...@fastmail.com
On Sat,
Since the 6.7 release there have been a few mentions of EFI boot
failure on amd64. The most common resolution has been to use legacy
boot. My T440P is running coreboot/TianoCore. The only way to legacy
boot requires re-flashing the chips via SOIC8 bus pirate.
Bisecting bootloader commits
> None of the clients gets more than cca 1.5MB/s from that, alone.
> Is that to be expected with 11g? (Not that I expect the 54 Mbit/s)
I faced the same problem with my new APU2 just yesterday and found
more info here: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=158680303103003=2
It seems like 11a is
Oh sorry, my mistake, I might need some sleep :)
Thanks for the list of USB adapters, that helps a lot.
> On Jun 6, 2020, at 9:35 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2020/06/06 19:14, Tristan wrote:
>> Ok thanks. Yes I’m looking for just using 11n.
>
> You already replied saying that!
>
>
On 2020/06/06 19:14, Tristan wrote:
> Ok thanks. Yes I’m looking for just using 11n.
You already replied saying that!
It doesn't matter if you only want to use 11n, OpenBSD does not have a
driver for the controller used in that adapter.
For USB adapters look for a device using one of these:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2020 19:14:28 +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> Is the aim to let the ISP know that the iface is down,
> so that it gets set up afresh on boot, as opposed to
> waiting for some PPP keep-alive timeout?
Basically. It is to work around an issue where the pppoe ethernet
interface goes down
Dear all,
multiboot installation of a BSD system with other operating systems
(OSs) on UEFI hardware is not officially supported by any of the
popular
BSDs. Because of the general interest in this topic, here I would like
to share my experience of running DragonFly BSD, OpenBSD, and Slackware
Hi,
On Jun 06 17:46:35, j...@kerhand.co.uk wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 05:56:56PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> > This is current/amd64 on an APU2.
> > The egress is XDSL pppoe(4) over vlan(4) over em(4),
> > as is the case with many European dialup telecoms.
> >
> > The connection itself works
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 11:05 AM ari.openbsd wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have problem with latest snapshot from 5 Jun
>
I too had a problem with yesterday's sysupgrade -s. It failed (twice) with
verification errors, and I just gave up and went to bed.
Today, just now, I got a clean upgrade to:
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 05:56:56PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> This is current/amd64 on an APU2.
> The egress is XDSL pppoe(4) over vlan(4) over em(4),
> as is the case with many European dialup telecoms.
>
> The connection itself works just fine (after some mss woes),
> but it takes some time to
Ok thanks. Yes I’m looking for just using 11n.
> On Jun 6, 2020, at 5:55 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2020-06-05, Tristan wrote:
>> Just plugged in a Realtek Edimax AC1750 USB card into a ASRock B450M board.
>> I can see the card being detected and registered properly in dmesg and
>>
Hi All,
I have problem with latest snapshot from 5 Jun
After sysupgrade booting looks like this:
probing: pc0 com0 com1 mem[248K 376K 255M 1596M 344K 13M 3M 6144M]
disk: hd0 hd1 hd2 hd3 hd4* hd5* sr0
>> OpenBSD/amd64 BOOTX64 3.51
switching console to com0
>> OpenBSD/amd64 BOOTX64 3.51
boot> boot
This is current/amd64 on an APU2.
The egress is XDSL pppoe(4) over vlan(4) over em(4),
as is the case with many European dialup telecoms.
The connection itself works just fine (after some mss woes),
but it takes some time to get assigned and IP address at startup.
$ cat
On Jun 06 15:34:32, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> This is current/amd64 on an APU@ (dmesg below). I put a
>
> athn0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 "Atheros AR5418" rev 0x01: apic 5 int 16
> athn0: MAC AR5418 rev 2, RF AR5133 (2T3R), ROM rev 5, address
> 00:1c:26:46:e4:8a
>
> into it, but it fails with
>
>
This is current/amd64 on an APU@ (dmesg below). I put a
athn0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 "Atheros AR5418" rev 0x01: apic 5 int 16
athn0: MAC AR5418 rev 2, RF AR5133 (2T3R), ROM rev 5, address 00:1c:26:46:e4:8a
into it, but it fails with
athn0: could not wakeup chip
athn0: unable to reset
This is current/amd64 on an APU2 (dmesg below). It's my AP, using
athn0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 "Atheros AR9281" rev 0x01: apic 5 int 16
athn0: AR9280 rev 2 (2T2R), ROM rev 11, address c0:d9:62:75:ee:26
athn0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
lladdr c0:d9:62:75:ee:26
index 4 priority 4 llprio
Hi All,
Not sure I am the only one and my config needs to change, but with tmux
config I am using I seeing a difference in 6.7-stable and 6.7-current in
the way the border is presented.
The config I am using is:
###
set -g base-index 1
set -g history-limit 1
set -g mouse on
set -g
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 10:52:38AM +0200, Marek Benc wrote:
> There's been some changes in the OpenBSD port of smartmontools,
> tools for working with S.M.A.R.T diagnostic of hard drives and SSDs,
> the platform-specific code was modernized, so it would be quite useful
> if people could test
> What if two systems being used as redundant firewalls had different network
> cards? This would make the names of the interfaces different, resulting in
> rule sets that were not the same, preventing per-rule state timeouts from
> being properly applied.
1) “egress” can be used to
28 matches
Mail list logo
