On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 09:47:54PM +0100, Julian Smith wrote:
> I've been finding egdb and gdb rather easily get stuck in an
> uninterruptible wait, e.g. when running the 'next' command after
> hitting a breakpoint.
>
> So it's not possible to kill the debuggee or gdb and the only way to
> kill
Status Code Available
DXE Status Code Available
>> OpenBSD/amd64 BOOTX64 3.50
boot>
booting hd0a:/bsd: 12952904+2757640+331808+0+708608
[807661+128+1024872+749630]=0x1272b18
entry point at 0x1001000
[ using 2583320 bytes of bsd ELF symbol table ]
Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 9:06 AM Alfred Morgan wrote:
>
> OpenBSD upgrade.lan 6.7 GENERIC.MP#182 amd64
>
> If I set tty com0 then bsd.rd boots fine. If I have a monitor plugged in
> bsd.rd boots fine. If I don't have a monitor and I don't direct tty to com0
> then bsd.rd reboots my machine after a
Paddy,
I wastnt engaging in FUD,
I was describing a situation which I and others experienced where there
were certain releases of
KVM / Linux Hypervisors which on Intel platforms on which OpenBSD
would Freeze,
the console would slow down and eventually become unresponsive,
if I recall correctly
> On Jul 19, 2020, at 5:44 PM, Tom Smyth wrote:
>
> Im not sure what you mean?
I can has all your VM’s in carbonite.
Regards
Patrick
Im not sure what you mean?
On Sun, 19 Jul 2020 at 23:43, Patrick Dohman
wrote:
>
>
> > On Jun 23, 2020, at 11:31 AM, Tom Smyth
> wrote:
> >
> > But newerversions of kvm / linux kernels are unaffected
> > By the bug fyi
>
> Sounds like FUD.
> B.T.W where is Boba’s ride?
> Regards
> Patrick
>
>
> On Jun 23, 2020, at 11:31 AM, Tom Smyth wrote:
>
> But newerversions of kvm / linux kernels are unaffected
> By the bug fyi
Sounds like FUD.
B.T.W where is Boba’s ride?
Regards
Patrick
I've been finding egdb and gdb rather easily get stuck in an
uninterruptible wait, e.g. when running the 'next' command after
hitting a breakpoint.
So it's not possible to kill the debuggee or gdb and the only way to
kill the debuggee process and free up its listening sockets seems to be
to
On 2020-07-19, obs...@loopw.com wrote:
>
>> Is this normal?
>
> Checksum is OPTIONAL in UDP, not required. This is covered in RFC 768.
For IPv4, anyway. It's required for v6.
Hi misc@,
I've installed OpenBSD 6.7 on a new laptop and I exprience some troubles
with the touchpad. To be simple: it seems to be considered like a
keyboard because when I use it, my computer behave like if I press a
letter indefinitely until I use the keyboard (then the behaviour stops
but
Hi misc@,
I've installed OpenBSD 6.7 on a new laptop and I experience some
problems when my laptop resume : the screen stays off. Whatever I do
like switching to a tty or restarting the X server, it stays off.
Everything seems to be ok behind because I can still enter commands if I
“blind
Adrian Grigore [adrian.emil.grig...@gmail.com] wrote:
> https://tilde.institute/
>
That's a cool project. Shell environments are the original social network.
Hi misc@,
I have installed OpenBSD 6.7 on a new laptop and I experiment regular
kernel panic. Unfortunately, I lack of information because ddb doesn't
start when it happens.
After some researches and tests, I've disabled inteldrm at kernel level
and since I don't experience any kernel
Hello Edgar,
Le 19/07/2020 à 00:35, ed...@pettijohn-web.com a écrit :
> Not sure how to integrate it properly but this sounds like a job for
> ifstated(8).
Triggering a sync at interface up status change wouldn't be enough: for
instance if only dhcpd crashes and recovers later, there is no
Hello Janne,
Le 19/07/2020 à 10:21, Janne Johansson a écrit :
> 2) dhcpd checks that ip's don't reply to ping (or exist in arp?) before
> handing out an ip from a dynamic range
How did you check that? I'm not as sure as you about that. For instance
if you define a static lease for a given
Den lör 18 juli 2020 kl 23:28 skrev Guy Godfroy :
> Hello,
>
> I am using two routers on OpenBSD (called mulder and scully), and I wish
> to make dhcpd listen on a carp interface between both of them. I am
> using the synchronization mechanism:
>
I noticed the same issue long time ago, but
https://tilde.institute/
dum., 19 iul. 2020, 08:47 Chris Cappuccio a scris:
> ibs...@ripsbusker.no.eu.org [ibs...@ripsbusker.no.eu.org] wrote:
> > Aaron Mason writes:
> > > What are you looking for in such a service?
> >
> > Minimally, SSH login, 100GB disk space, and build tools
> >
> > It's
> Is this normal?
Checksum is OPTIONAL in UDP, not required. This is covered in RFC 768.
Hi,
I noticed that UDP packets with a checksum of zero (0) make it through the
UDP stack to userland programs. Is there a knob to turn that off?
Offending packet:
08:38:28.035351 45.148.10.91.80 > 5.9.87.75.53: [no udp cksum] 65534+ [1au] ANY
(Class 10531)? .(24) (ttl 241, id 35118, len 52)
On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 01:13:51AM -0400, jcm...@gmail.com wrote:
> I saw that much of the amdgpu related drm code had been updated against
> linux 5.7 and decided to try it out using a recent snapshot. While the
> amdgpu module loads and is able to mirror to both of my displays when in
> a tty,
20 matches
Mail list logo