I tried kern.timecounter.hardware=tsc, no effect.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, July 30, 2020 10:46 PM, Brian Brombacher
wrote:
> Are you using: kern.timercounter.hardware=tsc ?
>
> I’m on 6.7 release and no issue with collectd.
>
> > On Jul 30, 2020, at 4:53 PM, Martin
Hello,
I have been using the following set-up for some time and have had
increasing issues with the external monitor not turning on, flashing
and behaving strangely. To stop this behavior, or to get the monitor to
turn on when it won't, I can restart the X server or reboot. It seems
that
I can test it on 6.7-current only, and I haven't tested collectd on 6.6 - 6.7
-stable. TSC looks synchronized, ntpd corrects small amount of time skew ~1s or
less.
VM time looks stable, but not enougth for time-series measurements.
Do you know any command to check TSC is "synchronized"?
Winter Paulson wrote:
> Some sysctl tuning might help, e. g.
Check net.inet.udp.recvspace and net.inet.udp.sendspace.
Might be the only values that you have to adjust.
Attached.
OpenBSD 6.7 (GENERIC.MP) #2: Thu Jun 4 09:55:08 MDT 2020
r...@syspatch-67-amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 17125511168 (16332MB)
avail mem = 16593870848 (15825MB)
mpath0 at root
scsibus0 at mpath0: 256 targets
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at
No, I am not using USB.
Log messages from collectd installed on OpenBSD 6.7-current VM:
2020-07-30T12:42:08+00:00 192.168.20.15 collectd[75320]: Not sleeping because
the next interval is 0.689 second in the past!
2020-07-30T12:42:25+00:00 192.168.20.15 collectd[75320]: Not sleeping because
the next interval is 0.069
Are you using: kern.timercounter.hardware=tsc ?
I’m on 6.7 release and no issue with collectd.
> On Jul 30, 2020, at 4:53 PM, Martin wrote:
>
> I can test it on 6.7-current only, and I haven't tested collectd on 6.6 -
> 6.7 -stable. TSC looks synchronized, ntpd corrects small amount of time
Hey Ivo,
td;dr:
Some sysctl tuning might help, e. g.
https://calomel.org/network_performance.html
(first reference I found, maybe someone can provide other/better
suggestions).
Apart from that some more info would be helpfull:
- How fast is the connection and how fast does iperf get with UDP
Latest obsd with new 4TB wd red ssd disk copying from 2TB seagate exos returns
80GB in 8 hours with zero activity by other tasks. The server has 12GB ecc ram
cache. Copying 1.4 TB from a nas to the same exos took 2.5 hours shy. Is there
a problem with how obsd handles internal storage? Or a
Chris Cappuccio [ch...@nmedia.net] wrote:
>
> such as: cp -r /usr/bin /mnt/usr/bin
> or: tar cf - -C /usr/bin . | tar xpf - -C /mnt/usr/bin
>
also the destination filesystem should be mounted with async (dangerous on
power loss) or softdep (not very dangerous on power loss) to avoid huge
Martin [martin...@protonmail.com] wrote:
>
> VM using NTP protocol to fine tune clock from the OpenBSD 6.7-current host,
> but collectd complain about clock skew in the past.
>
> Any ideas?
>
Does this happen with 6.6 or 6.7 as well? 6.7-current uses the TSC directly
to gather timestamps, but
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:37:39 -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Rupert Gallagher [r...@protonmail.com] wrote:
> > No, I am not using USB.
>
> your dmesg didn't make it to the list because you are attaching a text file
> and attachments are not allowed on misc.
Actually, these days they are allowed.
Rupert Gallagher [r...@protonmail.com] wrote:
> No, I am not using USB.
your dmesg didn't make it to the list because you are attaching a text file
and attachments are not allowed on misc.
please put it inline with the message.
Rupert Gallagher [r...@protonmail.com] wrote:
> No, I am not using USB.
rsync between disks should be very fast. you are going from the sata to the
nvme ? NetBSD or FreeBSD or somebody made some speed improvements to nvme
that we should review. i can't remember right now. anyways, 10GB/hour
On 07/30 08:06, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 02:57:33PM -0700, Jeremy Evans wrote:
> > After an OpenBSD upgrade, one of Ruby's tests for SSL session
> > reuse started to fail. After some debugging, I have found that
> > if a maximum SSL version is not set by a client, then
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 02:57:33PM -0700, Jeremy Evans wrote:
> After an OpenBSD upgrade, one of Ruby's tests for SSL session
> reuse started to fail. After some debugging, I have found that
> if a maximum SSL version is not set by a client, then session
> reuse does not work. Setting a minimum
Rupert Gallagher [r...@protonmail.com] wrote:
> Latest obsd with new 4TB wd red ssd disk copying from 2TB seagate exos
> returns 80GB in 8 hours with zero activity by other tasks. The server has
> 12GB ecc ram cache. Copying 1.4 TB from a nas to the same exos took 2.5 hours
> shy. Is there a
Hello all,
I run small ISP. All routers and firewalls run OpenBSD.
Reticently, client started to complain that their Citrix based systems
started to drop connections.
After some research, they tested with iperf and clearly see droped UDP
packets between my routers.
After that, I made test
I've managed to track this a little bit further.
Boot stop and waits until I connect to the server's java console on the iRMC.
Upon connect, even with wrong username/password virtual keyboard is attached
and boot continues. There seems to be some kind of infinite loop...
I've checked various
Hello, i replaced the MP kernel with the SP one and made some tests.
Perfomances are better, all cpu goes to the kernel and user processes. But
it is slow. I will ask to change the hardware, as it is old.
jy boisiaud
Le mer. 22 juil. 2020 à 08:36, jean-yves boisiaud <
21 matches
Mail list logo
