Dan Peretz wrote:
> Hello, the FAQ states this:
> "The installXX.iso and installXX.fs images do not contain an
> SHA256.sig file, so the installer will complain that it can't check
> the signature of the included sets [...] This is because it would make
> no sense for the installer to verify
Hello, the FAQ states this:
"The installXX.iso and installXX.fs images do not contain an
SHA256.sig file, so the installer will complain that it can't check
the signature of the included sets [...] This is because it would make
no sense for the installer to verify them. If someone were to make a
Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 05:26:22PM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> > This is a regression report for 019_libssl.patch
> > After applying libssl binary patch to 6.7 release s-nail-14.9.19 can no
> > longer close STARTTLS IPMI session with Gmail server. I recompiled
> >
‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, August 12, 2020 7:11 AM, Alan McKay wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> This is one that is difficult to test in a test environment.
>
> I've got OpenBSD 6.5 on a relatively new pair of servers each with 8G RAM.
>
> With some scripting I'm looking at feeding
Hi All,
I just used sysupgrade (followed by pkg_add -u) to update my desktop
system to:
OpenBSD 6.7-current (GENERIC.MP) #22: Tue Aug 11 21:29:51 MDT 2020
All is working quite well but I noticed some issue with the iridium
browser. When I tried to export my bookmarks, iridium crashed.
As an
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 05:26:22PM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> This is a regression report for 019_libssl.patch
> After applying libssl binary patch to 6.7 release s-nail-14.9.19 can no
> longer close STARTTLS IPMI session with Gmail server. I recompiled
> s-nail and rebooted the machine.
Hi,
I have a script that downloads "badhosts" from a site that continuously
updates through a distrubed network.
I currently limit my blocklist to 450,000 ip addresses.
real mem = 4261072896 (4063MB)
avail mem = 4119322624 (3928MB)
bios0: PC Engines apu2
-pa-r-- blocklist
Hi,
as the tables are stored in RAM anyway during thee processing it’s moreless
matter of how fast are your DIMMs / CPU. I’m usually work with several tables
with cca 30 K records - no impact on the performance so far.
S pozdravem / Kind regards
Martin Sukaný
UNIX Engineer, Developer,
On 2020-08-12 02:08, Stuart Henderson wrote:
The only proxy we have for "what is really used" is dmesg submissions.
Since 6.7 release:
amd64 62
i3865
arm64 3
macppc 2
octeon 1
Based on this there isn't a great case for adding any more.
I didn't realize you guys used dmesg@ as a
On 2020-08-12, Tomasz Rola wrote:
> Is there a way to have listing of offending IPs and perhaps grouping
> them into /nn subnets - other than writing oneself the script?
aggregate6, in packages. It will be slow on a large list, of course.
> Something as easy as awk might suffice, I guess - and
On 2020-08-12 05:11, Alan McKay wrote:
Hey folks,
This is one that is difficult to test in a test environment.
I've got OpenBSD 6.5 on a relatively new pair of servers each with 8G RAM.
With some scripting I'm looking at feeding block IPs to the firewalls
to block bad-guys in near real
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 03:00:03PM +0200, Martin Sukany wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as the tables are stored in RAM anyway during thee processing it’s
> moreless matter of how fast are your DIMMs / CPU. I’m usually work
> with several tables with cca 30 K records - no impact on the
> performance so far.
Wow over 160 MILLION (yes I screamed that) IPs!
How much RAM is in your system?
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 10:26 AM infoomatic wrote:
>
> We have ~30,000 entries in our table blocking networks and
> single ip addresses, all in all at the moment exactly 169,471,974 hosts
> being blocked. No idea
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20200812132648.kaxsj%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
| <20200812130039.lto3i%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
||Predrag Punosevac wrote in
|| <20200811212622.ugmda%punoseva...@gmail.com>:
|||This is a regression report for 019_libssl.patch
| ...
|||After
We have ~30,000 entries in our table blocking networks and
single ip addresses, all in all at the moment exactly 169,471,974 hosts
being blocked. No idea what your criteria is for "performance impact",
but we have no issues.
On 12.08.20 14:11, Alan McKay wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> This is one that
What is the Switch telling you about the LACP ?
can you do a
show port-channel
show port-channel detailed
sho port-channel summary
on the switch you are lagging with ?
can you also do a
sho run int port-channel ?
sho run int ethernet x,y
where x and y are the interfaces on the switch are
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 10:13:41PM +0200, Remi Locherer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 02:07:32PM -0400, Winfred Harrelson wrote:
> > I know others are using the new aggr(4) interface but I am having a
> > problem with trying to use it on some new servers I have recently
> > gotten. Hoping I
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20200812130039.lto3i%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
|Predrag Punosevac wrote in
| <20200811212622.ugmda%punoseva...@gmail.com>:
||This is a regression report for 019_libssl.patch
...
||After applying libssl binary patch to 6.7 release s-nail-14.9.19 can no
||longer close
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 08:11:14AM -0400, Alan McKay wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> This is one that is difficult to test in a test environment.
>
> I've got OpenBSD 6.5 on a relatively new pair of servers each with 8G RAM.
>
> With some scripting I'm looking at feeding block IPs to the firewalls
>
Hello Predrag, all.
Predrag Punosevac wrote in
<20200811212622.ugmda%punoseva...@gmail.com>:
|This is a regression report for 019_libssl.patch
|
|predrag@oko$ uname -a
|OpenBSD oko.int.bagdala2.net 6.7 GENERIC.MP#5 amd64
|predrag@oko$ syspatch -l
|001_wscons
|002_rpki
|003_ssh
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 07:52:10PM +0100, Tom Smyth wrote:
> Hi Winfred,
> the intel 710 is a complex card, I would suggest that you try updating the
> firmware on the card, available from intel.com or your card vendor,
> you may have to boot to a live linux cd to apply the firmware update,
>
>
This is one of those “How long is a piece of string” examples.
You don’t give a lot in the way of specifications so as to come up with a
reasonble guess. But the guesses are meaningless anyway, as the packet
filtering subsystems are pretty efficient and very rapid.
In reality with sufficient
Hey folks,
This is one that is difficult to test in a test environment.
I've got OpenBSD 6.5 on a relatively new pair of servers each with 8G RAM.
With some scripting I'm looking at feeding block IPs to the firewalls
to block bad-guys in near real time, but in theory if we got attacked
by a bot
Sonic wrote:
> Fresh install of -current and I'm getting these errors when running pkg_add:
>
> library pcap.8.4 not found
> /usr/lib/libpcap.so.9.0 (system): bad major
> library c++.4.0 not found
> /usr/lib/libc++.so.5.0 (system): bad major
> library c++abi.2.1 not found
>
The only proxy we have for "what is really used" is dmesg submissions.
Since 6.7 release:
amd64 62
i3865
arm64 3
macppc 2
octeon 1
Based on this there isn't a great case for adding any more.
25 matches
Mail list logo
