OpenBSD 6.8 GENERIC#5 i386
One of my systems rebooted at 03:01 local time today. I've seen kernel
panics and bad hardware but I've never seen OpenBSD "just reboot" by
itself, ever.
There's no cron job that would do this. last(1) is no help; it shows the
reboot command but not the shutdown that
Noah writes:
> vmm crashes during boot after upgrading a VM from Ubuntu 18 to Ubuntu 20.
> Host is running 6.8 with all syspatches
>
> vmd -dvvv output provides a log entry of:
> vcpu_run_loop: vm 7 / vcpu 0 run ioctl failed: Bad address
>
> and this coincides with a kernel message:
>
vmm crashes during boot after upgrading a VM from Ubuntu 18 to Ubuntu 20.
Host is running 6.8 with all syspatches
vmd -dvvv output provides a log entry of:
vcpu_run_loop: vm 7 / vcpu 0 run ioctl failed: Bad address
and this coincides with a kernel message:
vmx_fault_page: uvm_fault returns 14,
Hi Riccardo,
Any feedback regarding the proposed patch below?
Thanks,
Stefan
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 04:09:32PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 02:11:39PM +0100, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> > Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > > That means there is another bug. I will try to
just run a second nsd on separate (ip)/port, then use unbound as a router
On 3/25/21 12:52 PM, Родин Максим wrote:
> Hello,
> Is there a way to do split horizon dns using NSD?
> I did not find anything similar in man nsd.conf
Hi Misc,
Can we set up egre(4), etherip(4) or vxlan(4) tunnel over pppoe ?
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
On 2021-03-27, Valdrin Muja wrote:
> Can we set up egre(4), etherip(4) or vxlan(4) tunnel over pppoe ?
Yes, but watch out for MTU problems especially if you have pppoe on
one endpoint and ethernet at the other. See pppoe(4) about RFC 4638,
if your provider supports this it may be useful. If not
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 06:44:52PM +1100, john slee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On 2021-03-26, Richard Ulmer wrote:
> > > The `go` directive starts a new goroutine, which I would expect to be
> > > put into it's own process here. However, using htop(1) I can see, that
> > > only one of my two cores gets
Hi,
> On 2021-03-26, Richard Ulmer wrote:
> > The `go` directive starts a new goroutine, which I would expect to be
> > put into it's own process here. However, using htop(1) I can see, that
> > only one of my two cores gets load. Running the same program on Linux,
> > two cores are utilized.
9 matches
Mail list logo