On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 4:46 PM Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> Do both ix0 and ix1 break, or just ix1?
>
> One important difference visible in dmesg is that ix starts using MSI-X.
>
Some time ago, I noticed that ix1 isn't usable. I don't think it even shows
up in ifconfig -a on OpenBSD 6.7. I didn't
Am Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 06:38:08PM - schrieb Stuart Henderson:
> On 2022-01-16, Ax0n wrote:
> > I have a SuperMicro X9DRH-7TF that's been chugging along diligently in a
> > data center. I've been upgrading the vmm instances it hosts but I let the
> > host get pretty far behind. After running
holy crap, rather than maintain the drivers and net80211 layer, they are just
building compat for the linux version?
i guess this approach seems very rational for something as large as amdgpu...
stefan, your commits help to demystify more 802.11 chips and system for me.
over the years, hundreds
yes, thats correct and just to make sure you got my last email. I was able to
fix my issue inthe meantime by adding allow-opts
> On 16. Jan 2022, at 12:40, David Gwynne wrote:
>
> you've set the net.inet.gre.allow sysctl to 1, right?
>
>> On 16 Jan 2022, at 17:05, Markus Wipp wrote:
>>
>>
you've set the net.inet.gre.allow sysctl to 1, right?
> On 16 Jan 2022, at 17:05, Markus Wipp wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> First of all thank you so much taking the time for my question!
>
>> My first impression is that you're confusing where to apply policy to
>> the encapsulated traffic. "pass
Hi all,
I got this information from Peter, which did the trick!
I now have my complete rule-set with a block default policy working!
Thanks to David and Georg as well for their help!
Best regards
Markus
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: "Peter J. Philipp"
> Subject: Re: GRE IP6/IP6 not
6 matches
Mail list logo
