On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 at 22:40, Crystal Kolipe wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 10:33:16PM +1100, Darren Tucker wrote:
> > Fast ethernet (100base-T) uses pins 1, 2, 3 & 6
[...]
> But the output from ifconfig does suggest that the link was running with
> 1000baseT modulation:
>
> > media: Ethernet
Namaste Crystal,
Koti Koti Dhanyavaad for your reply.
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2023 at 3:21 PM
> From: "Crystal Kolipe"
> To: "Puru Shartha"
> Cc: "Misc"
> Subject: Re: Probable bug in disklabel(8) -R
>
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 04:02:43PM +0100, Puru Shartha wrote:
> > Problem:
> > The
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 04:02:43PM +0100, Puru Shartha wrote:
> Problem:
> The restored disk will have the boundend at 2 TB, instead of the source
> disk's full disk size boundend.
...
> The net effect may be that the restored disk has not had its boundary
> extended beyond the fdisk limit of 2
Namaste misc,
Introduction:
While using the "-R" option with disklabel(8), in a specific case, the
target disk may not match the source disk label parameters.
More precisely, the target disk's boundend may not match with the source
disk.
Overview:
A disk with storage greater than 2 TB and 512
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 10:33:16PM +1100, Darren Tucker wrote:
> Fast ethernet (100base-T) uses pins 1, 2, 3 & 6 while gigabit needs
> all eight. If you get a cable where one of 4, 5, 7 or 8 is broken (or
> someone cheaped out on the cable and it only has two pairs to begin
> with) you'll have a
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 at 13:49, vitmau...@gmail.com wrote:
> thank you Stu for the feedback. Turns out the problem was one of the
> cables. It is advertised as 5E, but maybe there is something fishy
> with it. Fact is, I bought another, changed it, and now I got
> something around 95 MBytes/s of LAN
6 matches
Mail list logo
