Claudio Jeker wrote:
> What a stupid interface, lets rebuild mktemp(2) and not learn from
> history. It is not like this is new unless you think 30years is new...
>
> Humanity is surely doomed
Yes, the next generation will face big challenges.
Hi All,
FYI, After running "sysupgrade -s" + "pkg_add -u" earlier today, I now
see these messages when I exit vim:
mjoelnir:awk 11.06 18:42:45 % vi substrtest.awk
...
vim:/usr/local/lib/libruby32.so: undefined symbol '_Unwind_Backtrace'
vim:/usr/local/lib/libruby32.so: undefined symbol
Thanks, Aaron, for your review.
But when I looked at the tech@ mailing listing description, I thought it would
be better to continue here.
I installed it on a USB disk, then I sent a compiled kernel here with the
option SDMMC_DEBUG parameter.
I've attached dmesg, pcidump outputs and
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 9:33 PM Aaron Mason wrote:
> Looks like it's picking it up, but can't enable it - from the attached dmesg:
>
> sdhc0 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 "Intel C3000 eMMC" rev 0x11: apic 2 int 16
> sdhc0: SDHC 3.0, 200 MHz base clock
> sdmmc0 at sdhc0: 8-bit, sd high-speed, mmc
Theo de Raadt @ 2023-06-11 00:01 -06:
> I assume you are on an architecture where the linker is LLVM ld,
> otherwise known as ld-lld in OpenBSD (some older architectures
> still use ld-bfd).
Yes, seems so.
uname -a:
OpenBSD cadmium.cadmium 7.3 GENERIC.MP#1125 amd64
ld --version:
LLD 13.0.0
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 9:16 PM Valdrin MUJA wrote:
>
> Hello OpenBSD,
>
> I'm trying to install OpenBSD 7.3 on a Cordoba Edge Gateway CPE(*) device
> manufactured by Silicom-USA. However, OpenBSD does not recognize the Intel
> C3000 eMMC (SOC type) disk that comes on it.
> Is there a way to
Hello OpenBSD,
I'm trying to install OpenBSD 7.3 on a Cordoba Edge Gateway CPE(*) device
manufactured by Silicom-USA. However, OpenBSD does not recognize the Intel
C3000 eMMC (SOC type) disk that comes on it.
Is there a way to run this?
Thanks.
Also you can find the dmesg output in the
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 12:01:04AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > I assume you are on an architecture where the linker is LLVM ld,
> > otherwise known as ld-lld in OpenBSD (some older architectures
> > still use ld-bfd).
> >
> > In llvm/lib/Support/Path.cpp, there is
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 12:01:04AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> I assume you are on an architecture where the linker is LLVM ld,
> otherwise known as ld-lld in OpenBSD (some older architectures
> still use ld-bfd).
>
> In llvm/lib/Support/Path.cpp, there is code that acts just like you describe:
I assume you are on an architecture where the linker is LLVM ld,
otherwise known as ld-lld in OpenBSD (some older architectures
still use ld-bfd).
In llvm/lib/Support/Path.cpp, there is code that acts just like you describe:
void createUniquePath(const Twine , SmallVectorImpl ,
10 matches
Mail list logo
