You might consider keeping your repo in an web/http directory for pulling and
having your other users submit patches to you via eg email. That way you don't
need ssh exposed to the public internet at all.
That's how I have my self hosted git repos set up anyway.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 10:28 AM lain. wrote:
>
> I have a pretty nifty network setup that allows me to host from home via
> WireGuard.
> But there's one thing I'm struggling with.
> Because for security reasons, I made it impossible for people outside
> the network to connect via SSH, but for
I have a pretty nifty network setup that allows me to host from home via
WireGuard.
But there's one thing I'm struggling with.
Because for security reasons, I made it impossible for people outside
the network to connect via SSH, but for Git to function properly, I need
to allow SSH only for
On 27/7/23 03:26, develo...@robert-palm.de wrote:
Saw some commits for the JH7110.
I flashed the latest RISCV snapshot miniroot73.img to an SD card and
plugged it into the VF 2. Couldn't boot unfortunately.
Commits on a master branch don't retrospectively magic their way into a
previous
Saw some commits for the JH7110.
I flashed the latest RISCV snapshot miniroot73.img to an SD card and
plugged it into the VF 2. Couldn't boot unfortunately.
Is that already possible ?
Or am I doing it wrong and there anything else to do than flashing the image ?
develo...@robert-palm.de wrote:
> Zitat von Theo de Raadt :
>
> > develo...@robert-palm.de wrote:
> >
> >> I suggest a mailing list for the RISCV arch.
> >>
> >> Ok?
> >
> >
> > It will be as popular and useful as the other per-architecture lists,
> > meaning -- it is the wrong approach.
>
>
Zitat von Theo de Raadt :
develo...@robert-palm.de wrote:
I suggest a mailing list for the RISCV arch.
Ok?
It will be as popular and useful as the other per-architecture lists,
meaning -- it is the wrong approach.
Understand. Thanks.
In consequence the other arch lists should be
develo...@robert-palm.de wrote:
> I suggest a mailing list for the RISCV arch.
>
> Ok?
It will be as popular and useful as the other per-architecture lists,
meaning -- it is the wrong approach.
I suggest a mailing list for the RISCV arch.
Ok?
>> It can be done, but 1) it means that it's possible for hosts on RFC1918
>> addresses to reach the routable addresses directly without going via the
>> router and vice-versa (which may or may not be a problem), 2) you'll
>> need to think about how you want to arrange things if you use DHCP, and
10 matches
Mail list logo
