On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 09:03:17PM +0100, James Johnson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> can anyone please advise on what computer I can purchase with the following \
> requirements:
> - fully supports OpenBSD
> - no noise
> - good quality wifi
> - small form factor preferably
> - processor does not need to
Sorry wrong address in my previous email
I meant to show this entry in my routing table
2620:ba:6000:3:58d2:48ff:fee6:270a 56:af:97:0f:66:6e
UHL0 12 - 4 vport0
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 2:03 PM Benjamin Raskin
wrote:
>
> As mentioned in my previous
On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 09:03:17PM +0100, James Johnson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> can anyone please advise on what computer I can purchase with the following
> requirements:
>
> - fully supports OpenBSD
> - no noise
> - good quality wifi
> - small form factor preferably
> - processor does not need
I recently switched my RockPro64 over to OpenBSD and so far everything works
nicely with it. I had trouble getting it to boot at first, but it was my fault
for not fully reading the installation instructions[1], and assuming that I
could simply `dd` the provided miniroot75.img to an SD card and
For various values of 'fully supports', I have multiple odroid HC4 units, and
they all run very well. I've booted them with OpenBSD to play with it, but
inevitably switched back to Linux. No built-in WiFi, but it has a single USB
socket that you could plug in a WiFi/Bluetooth dongle.
-JD.
>
The title says "AES-256 is as safe as AES-128" for a translation.
Hi,
Dear everyone who I contacted and haven't contacted so far. I have run
a test program against a practiced attack against AES-256. While trying
to restore the key with just 1 guessed t0 value (I have almost given up)
But in
Hi all,
can anyone please advise on what computer I can purchase with the following
requirements:
- fully supports OpenBSD
- no noise
- good quality wifi
- small form factor preferably
- processor does not need to be fast (no highly intensive compute load)
- low RAM need
- needs 1 TB of hard
vport0 is a member of veb0, along with em0, em1, em2, and em3,
with rad(8) running on vport0 announcing 2620:ba:6000:3::
vport0 only has a link-local address.
The premise of not having a dedicated route for 2620:ba:6000:3::/64 is
that multiple routers in various locations can advertise a prefix
On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 02:36:07PM -0400, Benjamin Raskin wrote:
> Hello, Claudio;
>
> Sorry about the mistake, I meant to paste the route entry for
> 2620:ba:6000:3:58d2:48ff:fee6:270a
> and instead pasted the link local address.
I looked at your route output and it makes little sense.
How is
Hello, Claudio;
Sorry about the mistake, I meant to paste the route entry for
2620:ba:6000:3:58d2:48ff:fee6:270a
and instead pasted the link local address.
Here is the output of the two commands
prod-router-wat-01$ bgpctl show fib 2620:ba:6000:3:58d2:48ff:fee6:270a
flags: B = BGP, C =
On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 02:03:52PM -0400, Benjamin Raskin wrote:
> As mentioned in my previous email, I'm looking to advertise global
> addresses such as 2620:ba:6000:3:58d2:48ff:fee6:270a, but then
> I took a look at my routing table and noticed that gateway/nexthop
> for this global address is a
As mentioned in my previous email, I'm looking to advertise global
addresses such as 2620:ba:6000:3:58d2:48ff:fee6:270a, but then
I took a look at my routing table and noticed that gateway/nexthop
for this global address is a MAC address
fe80::58d2:48ff:fee6:270a%vport0
Hello, Peter;
The addresses I'm trying to announce are global i.e.
2620:ba:6000:3:58d2:48ff:fee6:270a , however bgpd(8)
doesn't want to announce them for some reason.
When I check my routing table they appear however, when
taking a look at bgpctl they are not announced.
Ben Raskin
On Mon, May
On 2024 May 06 (Mon) at 10:14:21 -0400 (-0400), Benjamin Raskin wrote:
:Hello, all;
:
:I've been having some issues getting bgpd to announce IPv6 routes,
...
:
:bgpd(8) is configued to advertise all connected and static routes,
:however bgpd(8) only advertises routes that are connected to the
Hello, all;
I've been having some issues getting bgpd to announce IPv6 routes,
apologies for the dumb question in advance.
I've setup rad(8) and bgpd(8) on an OpenBSD machine. bgpd(8) is
sending routes over to some neighbors (routes such as
fd80::fce1:baff:fea6:bf3a) while rad(8) is sending
Hello,
I often have to deal with unwind refusing to serve dns queries.
When it happens I see an entry like this in the daemon log:
"May 6 13:15:22 main unwind[42415]: validation failure
: key for validation mangolassi.it.
is marked as invalid because of a previous no DNSSEC records"
Reading
On 2024-05-06, Eyüp Hakan Duran wrote:
> --9fb6bb0617c0773e
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to install webssh, which is a python package, on OpenBSD 7.5.
> My goal is to provide a tool for my email server users a means to change
> their
On 2024-05-05, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> Running pfstat -q gives:
> ioctl: DIOCGETSTATUS: Permission denied
> pf_query: query_counters() failed
>
> This is on a newly updated system (current)
> OpenBSD tugs.antarctica.no 7.5 GENERIC.MP#50 amd64
>
> Packages are also all up to date.
The kernel
On Mon, 06 May 2024 04:14:16 +0100,
Eyüp Hakan Duran wrote:
>
>--- stderr
>thread 'main' panicked at cryptography-cffi/build.rs:61:49:
>unable to find openssl include path
Try to run it with env OPENSSL_DIR="/usr" OPENSSL_STATIC=0
--
wbr, Kirill
19 matches
Mail list logo
