Re: doas called multiple times hangs

I applied this patch, as is, to the stable sources and it works now. Thanks. pon., 21 sty 2019 o 06:03 Ted Unangst napisał(a): > Ted Unangst wrote: > > Dariusz Sendkowski wrote: > > > Yes, it does. > > > > > > I extracted 'unveilco

Re: doas called multiple times hangs

Yes, it does. I extracted 'unveilcommands' function from doas.c and put it into a standalone program to run it. It turned out the result was the same as in doas command. When I disable unveil, then it works fine. niedz., 20 sty 2019 o 22:31 Ted Unangst napisał(a): > Dariusz Sendkow

Re: doas called multiple times hangs

I investigated the problem a little more and found, that when there is a non-existent directory entry in my PATH, the problem occurs. If all of the directories from my PATH exist, then it works fine. niedz., 20 sty 2019 o 12:00 Dariusz Sendkowski napisał(a): > This is -stable 6.4. > doa

Re: doas called multiple times hangs

This is -stable 6.4. doas.conf: permit nopass myuser as root On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 at 11:50, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote: > On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 11:15:38AM +0100, Dariusz Sendkowski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Calling 'doas' in a loop makes the machine hang. > > I gu

doas called multiple times hangs

Hi, Calling 'doas' in a loop makes the machine hang. I guess this is not an expected behavior. It can be checked by executing the following simple bash script: for i in {0..2} do doas ls some_dir done I have run it on three different machines and the result is the same on each of them.

Re: opportunity to help: %s audit in mandoc

ime as I'd like to so this goes rather slowly. 2016-08-09 18:41 GMT+02:00 attila <att...@stalphonsos.com>: > Hi {Ingo,Darius,misc@}, > > Ingo Schwarze <schwa...@usta.de> writes: > > > Hi Dariusz, > > > > Dariusz Sendkowski wrote on Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at

Re: opportunity to help: %s audit in mandoc

OK, but from which branch? Can the results be sent incrementally? 2016-08-07 19:57 GMT+02:00 Ingo Schwarze : > Hi, > > from time to time, people ask how they can help OpenBSD development > if they are new to that task. > > Right now, there is a useful opportunity. Take the

Re: github

2016-08-07 18:42 GMT+02:00 Chris Bennett < chrisbenn...@bennettconstruction.us>: > On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 10:06:56AM -0600, Jack J. Woehr wrote: > > whereas on GitHub it would belong to a corporation. > > > > Doesn't that simply end the discussion right there? > > Yes. > This thread has been

github

Is this https://github.com/openbsd the official OpenBSD github site? Do you have any plans to move the OpenBSD source code repository to github?