We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to
know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD?
As machine we defined something with processor, ram, network, hard
disk and a connection to the internet.
cpu0: Intel Pentium (P54C) (GenuineIntel 586-class) 133
Step one would probably be a PIM-DM, later on it can be expanded to support
PIM-SM.
Hmm - is there still a userbase for DM that would warrant supporting it first
from a practical standpoint, or is it simply that it is much easier to code and
lays the groundwork for SM without diverting
Yeah, 20% or so, with RAIDframe being the only change:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5281094 Sep 16 21:30 bsd-stock-3.8-install
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 6072989 Jan 22 10:28 bsd-raid-38stab-012206
no, that's 15%.
Rounded to 5 and 6, did the math after sending ;-)
but still strange,
The main reason RAIDframe is not in GENERIC, I seem to recall, is that
it makes the kernel quite a bit bigger for no gain in the average case.
Yeah, 20% or so, with RAIDframe being the only change:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5281094 Sep 16 21:30 bsd-stock-3.8-install
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel
.I've messed it up but good. How do I
reinitialize wd1a and/or raid0 and/or start over completely?
-Dave Diller
Oh... and from the obivous bugs department: In rf_openbsdkintf.c
case RAIDFRAME_GET_COMPONENT_LABEL:
there is a:
RF_Free( clabel, sizeof(RF_ComponentLabel_t));
missing before the:
return(EINVAL);
But that won't help with the problem your describing... (just noticed
the above as I
6 matches
Mail list logo
