On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, Theo de Raadt wrote:
If someone wants to solve this fully there have been some proposals
for keeping track of the instruction sequence, and attempting to
reapply it upon each relink in the build directory. There just hasn't
been any scripting changes to do that from anyone,
[ I tried sending this Monday morning; I just a DSN for failure --
so trying again, from different address. ]
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015, Claus Lensbøl wrote:
On 18-08-2015 21:32, Ed Hynan wrote:
From: Claus Lensbøl cl...@fab-it.dk
I am running openbsd 5.6 GENERIC.MP#333 amd64.
Using isc-dhcp
From: Claus Lensbøl cl...@fab-it.dk
I am running openbsd 5.6 GENERIC.MP#333 amd64.
Using isc-dhcp-server 4.3.0.
I had no route to host w/ ISC DHCP 4.3.0 on OpenBSD 4.9 -- the
patch at end of message got it working. Hint was need for
'%IF' using ping6.
I applied the patch on OpenBSD 5.5 w/o
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Charles Musser wrote:
Hi,
I'm experimenting with using IPv6 via a tunnel broker provided by an
ISP. The tunnel works, but I want to confirm my understanding of the
commands they gave me to set it up. These are the commands:
ifconfig gif0 tunnel 50.1.94.112 72.52.104.74
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Charles Musser wrote:
On Aug 20, 2014, at 4:15 AM, Ed Hynan eh_l...@optonline.net wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Charles Musser wrote:
- prefix::1 is the local address of the interface on the IPv6
network.
No, *::2 is local.
Ah, yes. Despite my best efforts
This is with 5.5 release on i386 (32 bit).
When main program has more than one function pointer declared
with the *same names* as functions in a shared library, and
initializes one (at least) with the symbol from that library
with dlsym(), and references the second in some way (take
address,
The latest openssl patch was announced on the announce list.
Do any of the system's static binaries use lib(ssl|crypto).a?
-Ed
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Do any of the system's static binaries use lib(ssl|crypto).a?
A few use -lcrypto:
iked isakmpd dc ftp
Only one uses -lssl and -lcrypto:
ftp
Thanks for the prompt reply.
dc! That caught me by surprise.
-Ed
On Mon, 4 Aug 2014, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Ed Hynan eh_l...@optonline.net wrote:
Saturday morning, saw this in /var/log/messages:
Aug 2 08:29:12 lucy su: default: setting resource limit openfiles:
Invalid argument
(BTW, I quoted a line I produced by hand
On Tue, 5 Aug 2014, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Ed Hynan eh_l...@optonline.net wrote:
Failure to set the resource limits isn't considered fatal for
setusercontext(). It would be Bad if a typo there could leave you unable
to login or su to root...
Agreed. My case
Saturday morning, saw this in /var/log/messages:
Aug 2 08:29:12 lucy su: default: setting resource limit openfiles: Invalid
argument
That's from /etc/weekly, which uses 'su -m nobody' for locate db update
on line 52. The log message can be produced by hand with, e.g.:
# echo /bin/echo FOO |
11 matches
Mail list logo
