Theo de Raadt wrote:
Oh my. Have you considered hiring a consultant?
Of course. As you have already noticed, I have no idea about how to do what I'm
trying to do. But a consultant is out of my budget.
Are you guys saying all I have to do is the following, and packets will
automatically be
You guys are focusing on the netmasks. Let's consider my setup again BUT with
all netmasks at 0x, so all the forwarding and routing need to be
explicitly configured.
On Sep 3, 2020, at 15:07 AM, Brian Brombacher wrote:
"Your setup ... requires pf \rules and additional routing tables to make this
work."
And which pf rules and how to establish those routing tables are exactly what
I'm asking.
But ok, let's say I reassign addresses so Comp1 re1=
I forgot to say, in every computer I have /etc/sysctl.conf with
"net.inet.ip.forwarding=1".
And I insist, what shocks me the most is that tcpdump shows in both computers
the right icmp packets but ping says 100% packets lost.
I was actually wondering about using netmask 0x for the external
interface. As you noted, they are different networks, I just wanted to be able
to use any 192.168/16 ip address in the internal network and use nat-to and
rdr-to in Computer1 so every packet going to or from the ISP router
r (including Computer1 with
Computer5, thru Computer2)? In every information I have found this is
automatically done with DHCP, which I won't use, or BGP-4, RIP,OSPF,etc., which
I will neither use because these addresses and routes will be static.
Thank you.
Ernest Stewart.
6 matches
Mail list logo
