Re: My OpenBSD 5.0 installation experience (long rant)

2012-03-12 Thread Fredrik Staxeng
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff czark...@gmail.com writes: So you state that the fact that if one chooses to use the whole disk, the whole disk is used needs further documentation? Once upon a time, mkfs used to make a 10-second pause before starting. That's the way you do it. -- Fredrik Stax\ang | rot13:

Re: My OpenBSD 5.0 installation experience (long rant)

2012-03-12 Thread Fredrik Staxeng
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff czark...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 08:55 +0100, Fredrik Staxeng wrote: Dmitrij D. Czarkoff czark...@gmail.com writes: So you state that the fact that if one chooses to use the whole disk, the whole disk is used needs further documentation? Once upon

Snappy Answers to Stupid Questions - WTF?

2012-03-08 Thread Fredrik Staxeng
Do you want users at all? Or was Linus right? -- Fredrik Stax\ang | rot13: s...@hcqngr.hh.fr This is all you need to know about vi: ESC : q ! RET

Re: Relaying denied. Trying to do TLS+SMTP AUTH. Do I really need SASL?

2007-07-01 Thread Fredrik Staxeng
Lyndon Nerenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, that is exactly what I want to do. I use the system passwords for imap anyway, so why not? Of course, the channel must be protected by SSL/TLS when you do that. Because there are a large number of IMAP clients that are not aware of

Relaying denied. Trying to do TLS+SMTP AUTH. Do I really need SASL?

2007-06-30 Thread Fredrik Staxeng
I have a server that runs OpenBSD 4.1, and a laptop running Windows. I want to use Thunderbird on the laptop to send mail via the server. The laptop connects from many different networks. I would like to use port 587, since some isps blocks port 25. I want to use my username/password to

Re: Relaying denied. Trying to do TLS+SMTP AUTH. Do I really need SASL?

2007-06-30 Thread Fredrik Staxeng
Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 2007/06/30 12:46, Fredrik Staxeng wrote: Googling gives a lot of references to SASL. Do I really have to go down that road to do something as simple as this? for smtp auth, yes. OK. but for a simple use like this, why not just ssh-tunnel

Re: Relaying denied. Trying to do TLS+SMTP AUTH. Do I really need SASL?

2007-06-30 Thread Fredrik Staxeng
Claus Assmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Jun 30, 2007, Fredrik Staxeng wrote: I get the dreaded 'Relaying denied. Proper authentication needed.' You don't need AUTH, STARTTLS is sufficient. See cf/README: Relaying SMTP STARTTLS can allow relaying for remote SMTP clients which

Re: Relaying denied. Trying to do TLS+SMTP AUTH. Do I really need SASL?

2007-06-30 Thread Fredrik Staxeng
Claus Assmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Jun 30, 2007, Fredrik Staxeng wrote: Claus Assmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I get the dreaded 'Relaying denied. Proper authentication needed.' You don't need AUTH, STARTTLS is sufficient. See cf/README: Then I would need client certificates

Re: Relaying denied. Trying to do TLS+SMTP AUTH. Do I really need SASL?

2007-06-30 Thread Fredrik Staxeng
Claus Assmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Jun 30, 2007, Fredrik Staxeng wrote: I have a self-signed server cert that I created using commands that I barely understand. I have no idea where to start. By reading the fine instructions :-) man starttls I have read that, done that. Nothing

Re: Relaying denied. Trying to do TLS+SMTP AUTH. Do I really need SASL?

2007-06-30 Thread Fredrik Staxeng
Claus Assmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Jun 30, 2007, Fredrik Staxeng wrote: man starttls I have read that, done that. Nothing about client certs there. sendmail doesn't care as long as it is a cert. Surely it has to be signed with some key trusted by the particular sendmail