Yup,
I used this in (function splitfields) where the delimiter was chosen
with getopt:
http://etudiant.epitech.net/~veins/sort/sort.c
Oh yes, sort... that reminds me...
http://www.gtoal.com/wordgames/sort/sort.[ch]
- see the above for the epitome of managing store yourself...
It's
http://www.sun.com/blueprints/0406/819-6320.pdf
I'm not a C developer so it is mostly Greek to me, but others may find
some concepts therein useful.
30 years after VMS and 40 years after EMAS.
Ivan Sutherland sure had it right with his observatiion
of the great wheel of reincarnation as it
But what if your system has no compiler? When attacker should compile his
sploit anywhere, and transfer binary evil code onto your box. E.g. he has
to
have access to the similar machine, maybe with similas OS version and arch.
I know not having a compiler has been considered secure
NO - it does not! Well, not unless the sending MTA is broken. To quote
from Postfix documentation referring to not getting an MX record from
DNS:
By default, the Postfix SMTP client defers delivery and tries again
after some delay. This behavior is required by the SMTP standard.
Yes it
$ host -t mx stonehenge.com
stonehenge.com mail is handled by 666 spamtrap.stonehenge.com.
stonehenge.com mail is handled by 5 blue.stonehenge.com.
Any mail delivered to spamtrap gets the following response:
450 Violation of RFC2821 Section 5 Paragraph 8 correlates highly with
spamming
Although I know where David is coming from with this slightly
contentious comment, he's wrong. The argument is that most
senders will do their own back-off, and the hassle of setting
up a *good* backup MX server is so high that the benefit scarcely
justifies it.
However where he is wrong is not
uuencode test.txt test.txt
The parameter is not the file name, it's what is written after
the begin (ie the ouyput file name)
G
If it's that popular it's worth setting up a torrent!
G
Just an update on the popularity of the OpenBSD 3.8 VM image:
Since it was posted on Dec 19 (4 days ago), apache logs have shown 2826
hits on the file with just over 277 gigs of traffic created by those
downloads.
Not bad for only a few days.
I hope this isn't too OT for this list, but...
From: Hannah Schroeter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And there's no mailout pool with shared queue involved, and if the
envelope sender address is always the same (i.e. no VERP, no SES,
no self-signed SRS, no SRS-enabled forwards, etc.).
Surprisingly few.
problem? During the initial weeks of using
(description of why it can't work deleted for brevity)
Now, your bridge should bridge this dhcp-packet from one interface to the
other? That doesn't work: its sending this packet out through that
interface, it can't send it out on all other interfaces.
So there's no solution? I see now that
I'm still confused.
Why do you need to succed in getting a DHCP address for _both_ interfaces?
Wouldn't it be OK if jsut the one that hapened to face the DHCP server came
up? This would still give you remote access.
I can get away with DHCP on one side only, but having actually tried
this
My experience is that greylisting requires at least 2 failed attempts.
Maybe my pf.conf isn't setup properly. But, there's always 1 'extra' failure
that seems to me should pass through.
James is right, it's a design flaw of spamd that two failed attempts
are required. This is what happens:
I wanted to set up a system which has two ether cards (it's part of
a transparent bridge so it'll be inline with someone's connection)
such that it'll pick up a DHCP address on *both* cards ... the trick
comes from not knowing in advance whether the DHCP server will be
on the inside connection or
I use a bridge and assign the IP to one NIC, albeit statically assigned,
on several production OpenBSD 3.5 systems. If I ever switched the IP to
the Other NIC, I would lose connectivity until the ARP tables on the
various LAN hosts updated with the new MAC address. Maybe about 10 minutes
Maybe I'm not understanding the problem, but for a tranparent bridge, you
wouldn't want it to be assigned an IP address on either network card. hence
the transparent part.
You would think so, but you would be wrong. As I was when I started
this project. In OpenBSD a bridge must either have
The only fix for this is a *major* redesign of spamd (or equivalently
incorporating spamd's greylisting code into a spamfilter which *does*
relay connections at the IP level to an MTA - which is actually what I'm
working on at the moment)
Why start from scratch ? There are enough seasoned,
On 10/26/05, James Harless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chad,
I appreciate the insight. I do realize it's a difficult problem but,
I think that there's a solution (albeit possibly from someone smarter
than I).
Nope there's just not.
There is, but not with spamd as currently implemented.
It *ought* to be possible to configure both hostname.xl0 and hostname.fxp1
as dhcp, and whichever one comes up first, will then bridge through the
DHCP server for the other. Unfortunately it just happens by luck of
alphabetical order, that the one which comes up first is *not* looking
at a
Assuming that the problem turns out to be that the dhcp request for
fxp1 is always routed out of fxp1 (makes sense, right?) what can I do
to have it routed out the other interface via bridging? (Remembering
that the solution has to work symmetrically, if in some other deployment
it is the
What I expected was that the first would sleep for a
short time then ask again, and get it OK. I haven't seen that happen -
about 30 minutes later and the interface still has no IP.
[This goes vastly OT, I know:]
I am blank astonished that it seems to be impossible to get two
Turning this into a learning experience: Does anyone have any hints or
advice about hardening OpenBSD for shell accounts. Do people tweak
things other than the login.conf settings? I have to deal with student
shell accounts where students are learning to program and often create
problems
For anyone who is interested, I've written up a document on
how to install OpenBSD, configure it as a transparent bridge,
then install spamd on it. It was written primarily for our
campus computer center who want to know how to do it if something
happens to me (like I get a better job elsewhere
You've got a couple of weird things and errors on your page:
- You say OpenBSD doesn't support multiple consoles: ctrl+alt+f2
Yup! Thanks. Linux uses ALT-Fkey which I tried. Didn't try
adding CTRL. :-/ Assumed it didn't have it, and too busy getting
everything else working to go look for
steven mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 03:11:59PM -0500, Graham Toal wrote:
For anyone who is interested, I've written up a document on
how to install OpenBSD, configure it as a transparent bridge,
then install spamd on it. It was written primarily for our
25 matches
Mail list logo
