Ok, after further investigations, my problem does not seems to be linked
with inteldrm. The kernel panic seems to happen randomly with or without
inteldrm enabled.
Nevertheless, if I disable inteldrm, I can access ddb when the panic
happen (I don't know why, BTW) and I get this.
kernel:
.
Kind regards,
Jérôme FRGACIC
$ dmesg
OpenBSD 6.7 (GENERIC.MP) #4: Wed Jul 15 11:16:20 MDT 2020
r...@syspatch-67-amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 8384339968 (7995MB)
avail mem = 8117616640 (7741MB)
mpath0 at root
scsibus0 at mpath0: 256 targets
mainbus0
in advance.
Kind regards,
Jérôme FRGACIC
$ dmesg
OpenBSD 6.7 (GENERIC.MP) #4: Wed Jul 15 11:16:20 MDT 2020
r...@syspatch-67-amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 8384339968 (7995MB)
avail mem = 8117616640 (7741MB)
mpath0 at root
scsibus0 at mpath0: 256 targets
mainbus0
to fix this issue with inteldrm?
I have an Intel UHD Graphics « card ».
I put below the output of dmesg, pcidump -v and Xorg.0.log, if it can help.
Thanks in adavance.
Kind regards,
Jérôme FRGACIC
$ dmesg
OpenBSD 6.7 (GENERIC.MP) #4: Wed Jul 15 11:16:20 MDT 2020
r...@syspatch-67-amd64
Thanks for all your replies.
it means the optcode does alllow or prevent media removal it depends on
the prevent bits in the cdb but you basically just have a 00 for allow
or a 01 for prevent in the cdb. Anyway since sense already told you the
request is illegal you have to figure out what
Thanks for your reply.
# cdio -f /dev/rcd0c tao -s 1 file.iso
Maybe? Raw device and slow speed
I've try it, but unfortunetly it doesn't change anything, nothing is
written on the disk and it spins forever.
Nevertheless, after further investigation, it seems that the problem
only appear
regards,
Jérôme FRGACIC
PS: I do not have subscribe to this mailing list, so please add me as a
recipient if you reply to this message.
OpenBSD 6.4 (GENERIC.MP) #8: Thu Mar 21 14:26:24 CET 2019
r...@syspatch-64-amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 1999732736
You seem to be equating the setgid bit with the concept of "start a
process with a different gid".
No, that's not what it does. The setgid bit starts a new executable
with a disjoint mix of effective, saved, and real gid list, as well as
a gidlist.
Maybe it was not clear in my message but:
Thanks for your reply.
You are providing a program with an additional gid. The program has
not been coded be aware of that gid. Two potentially different
filesystem views now exist within the program, depending on the g=rwx
bits of directories and files in the tree. The program is no longer
26 2016 /usr/bin/ftp
$ grep ftpcmd /etc/pf.conf
pass out on if proto tcp from (if:0) to any port { 80,443 } group ftpcmd
Kind regards,
Jérôme FRGACIC
PS: I not subscribe to this list, so please add me as recipient if you
reply.
Hello,
Invoking ed -s file.txt, where file does not contain a newline at
the end, sends to stderr in spite of -s flag: newline appended.
Is this normal behaviour?
Yes, the -s option concern only messages printed on stdout.
Does ed/sed spoil files with non ascii bytes (for example unicode
Yes, the -s option concern only messages printed on stdout.
Sorry, this is bullshit.
The message: newline appended is an informational message, not a
diagnostic (error message). I supposed this is why it is not concerned
by the -s option.
If you see it only once, you can ignore it.
Ok, this is the case for me.
But do you still need to restart your printer?
No, this problem seem actually to be fixed, thank you. :)
Thank you for your reply.
Unfortunately, after upgrading my system to -current and applying the
patch you send to me to the kernel, I got the same error.
Here is the result of the dmesg command :
OpenBSD 5.5-current (GENERIC.MP) #1: Mon Jul 14 22:05:14 CEST 2014
that
call the foomatic-rip command with the corrects arguments).
Kind regards,
Jérôme FRGACIC
$ dmesg
OpenBSD 5.5 (GENERIC.MP) #0: Sat May 3 15:28:46 CEST 2014
r...@basile.my.domain:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile
msgid CAJO05K02bX+YsbbW6aT1G3mBALt3=TgMPifKeJFWHMtim=k...@mail.gmail.com
Thanks for your replies. :)
On 15/12/2013 18:54, Nick Holland wrote:
Would be interesting to try your test on a non-nvidia machine.
I do the same test on an intel based machine and, effectively, there
is an improvement: it
Hi misc,
I have installed OpenBSD on an USB stick (a Kingston DataTraveler G3).
Nevertheless, the system is quite slow... For example, I recently install
firefox or, more precisely, those packages:
at-spi2-atk-2.8.1.tgz
at-spi2-core-2.8.0.tgz
dbus-glib-0.100.2v0.tgz
dconf-0.16.1.tgz
17 matches
Mail list logo