Re: 004_pf.patch path not correct for 4.2

2008-02-23 Thread Jay Hart
> On 24/02/2008, at 10:44 AM, Jay Hart wrote: > >> I see that there is some problem trying to apply patch 004 (the pf >> patch) >> under 4.2. Looks like there was some discussion late in Mov 07 >> about fixing >> the patch to correct for wrong path / mi

004_pf.patch path not correct for 4.2

2008-02-23 Thread Jay Hart
I see that there is some problem trying to apply patch 004 (the pf patch) under 4.2. Looks like there was some discussion late in Mov 07 about fixing the patch to correct for wrong path / missing directory tree in the patch. I've updated the index line (changed it from sys to src, but I still can'

Re: libc.so.39.3

2008-02-23 Thread Jay Hart
thanks for the hands-up. For right now I've made the sym link while I get the box production ready. I intend to install latest version of the app (APCUPSD) on the box, once I get all the patches applied, and my environment settled. Speaking of patches, I see that there is some problem trying to

libc.so.39.3

2008-02-23 Thread Jay Hart
On base OpenBSD 4.2. What package should I install to get the above library? Thanks, Jay

Re: Updates for old releases

2008-02-22 Thread Jay Hart
> Jay Hart schrieb: >> One question I have is if 4.0 is stilled being patched? I notice that there >> are several patches out in 4.2 or 4.1, for example: >> >> 005: RELIABILITY FIX: January 11, 2008 All architectures >> A missing NULL pointer check can lead to

Re: Updates for old releases

2008-02-22 Thread Jay Hart
One question I have is if 4.0 is stilled being patched? I notice that there are several patches out in 4.2 or 4.1, for example: 005: RELIABILITY FIX: January 11, 2008 All architectures A missing NULL pointer check can lead to a kernel panic. A source code patch exists which remedies this proble

Re: [OT] beefy steel cases

2008-02-12 Thread Jay Hart
Back then, adding another channel meant buying another $275 SCSI card. Wasn't on my radar. Jay > Jay Hart wrote: >>>> Yes, I too at one time bought a huge case. Has 10 5.25 bays. Only problem >>>> is >>>> that you can't use all of them due to c

Re: [OT] beefy steel cases

2008-02-11 Thread Jay Hart
>> Yes, I too at one time bought a huge case. Has 10 5.25 bays. Only problem >> is >> that you can't use all of them due to cable length limitations. > > Multiple controllers? Onboard IDE controller (pri and sec interface) and a Adaptec 2940 SCSI card. > >>> I have one of these, http://calpc.com

Re: [OT] beefy steel cases

2008-02-11 Thread Jay Hart
If anyone is interested, I have five of the cases at the following website for sale. http://www.kevla.org/cases Jay > I have one of these, http://calpc.com/catalog/mid_tower.html, and its quite > beefy.

Re: [OT] beefy steel cases

2008-02-11 Thread Jay Hart
Yes, I too at one time bought a huge case. Has 10 5.25 bays. Only problem is that you can't use all of them due to cable length limitations. With SCSI2, could use up to 4 prior to exceeding 36 inch cable limit. Then could use two more for IDE. But the other 4, never could use. J > I have one of

Re: Forwarding roots mail to another account , seperate email server

2008-02-11 Thread Jay Hart
rg. These are being returned from my ISP, so I also think that when they show back up for delivery, they are getting hung because [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not exist as a valid account on my email server. But, why aren't they being sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your advice greatly appreciated. Jay &

Re: Forwarding roots mail to another account , seperate email server

2008-02-11 Thread Jay Hart
Henning, You are right, it is ~/.forward Any suggestions? > * Jay Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-11 17:58]: >> Regardless, I can't seem to get mail forwarding working. The two main >> openbsd >> books say all I need to do is create a .forwarding file and give

Forwarding roots mail to another account , seperate email server

2008-02-11 Thread Jay Hart
I am using openbsd 4.0. I have a standard non-X install, setup as a router/firewall NATing several boxes. I am port forwarding 25 and 80 to a single box behind the firewall. So, I do not have sendmail per se running on the openbsd box, but local mail is working. Not sure I have the proper termin

<    1   2