On 2024-05-30 14:56:50 -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> This is not a bug. An awk associative array is effectively a hash
> table so when you iterate over it like this you are not guaranteed
> to get things in any particular order. In fact, our awk, mawk and
> gawk all produce different output
ither of
those files and a sh or ksh or whatever is run in a suitable directory?
On 2024-04-08 15:30:11 +, Jeremy Mates wrote:
> 79510 ksh NAMI "none.db"
> 79510 ksh RET open -1 errno 2 No such file or directory
> 79510 ksh CALL mprotect(0x4e89f6
Given
logger foo;xterm -tn xterm-256color -e ktrace -di /bin/ksh
the log message 'ksh: vfprintf %s NULL in "%.*s"' appears when
~/.terminfo/x/xterm/xterm-256color does not exist.
The log message no longer appears after running
cp /usr/share/terminfo/x/xterm-256color ~/.terminfo/x/
and
On 2024-04-02 15:34:56 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> If you mean a shell with which to run shellscripts, I wouldn't do that.
> Inside bash is a big old messy attack surface. There was a bash exploit
> several years ago (was it heartbleed?) that caused me to change all
> shellscript shebangs to
Nov 12 19:41:30 gear pkg_add: Added firefox-119.0->119.0.1
Nov 12 19:41:55 gear pkg_add: Added ghostscript-10.02.0->10.02.1
PDF builds fail, can someone confirm this isn't my system being wacky?
$ ls test.*
test.ly
$ cat test.ly
\version "2.22.2"
The crash happens maybe a few times per year, and eventually resolved to
the following guard with the error "Tailq for buffer \xc8 is empty", but
I'm not sure how \xc8 is getting there, maybe I'm lingering on a control
key or something whilst flailing at the keyboard. Some idle testing with
"p did
On 2023-05-13 20:53:01 -0700, Kastus Shchuka wrote:
> Have you tried using ?[\?] in extended mode? It works for me.
Yes, that's already in the blog posting and is a bit more to type and remember
than a ?\?
On 2023-05-13 10:26:42 +0200, Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri wrote:
> I'm assuming this is with the "extended" option set in vi, right?
Yes.
A search for /\/ is okay; this discards the \ and searches for "/"
A search for ?\? is not okay; this discards the \ and searches for "?"
which is an invalid regular expression, "RE error: repetition-operator
operand invalid".
A problematic bare leading ? on a backwards search can be escaped by
On 2022-12-12 10:01:05 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> I think this is the wrong way around. The callers need to be fixed to pass
> a blocking stdin to programs since that is what every unix utility
> expects. What you propose it to fix every unix utility to have such a check
> at the start of main.
...
42136 ex RET read -1 errno 35 Resource temporarily unavailable
42136 ex CALL read(0,0x3d94b585400,0xff)
42136 ex RET read -1 errno 35 Resource temporarily unavailable
42136 ex CALL read(0,0x3d94b585400,0xff)
...
this condition can
On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 10:04:36PM +0100, Steve Fairhead wrote:
> For Sendmail, the error is "TLS handshake failed"; for smtpd, it's
> "Network error on destination MXs".
one "fix" would be to disable TLS for the domains in question, which
at least would let the mail go through until the
12 matches
Mail list logo
