Re: 4.8 Sparc64 rtadvd crash

=0xfffe35de \005o?=, ifindex=0, lenp=0xfffe3528, filter=28678) at /usr/src/usr.sbin/rtadvd/if.c:247 247 get_rtaddrs(rtm-rtm_addrs, sa, rti_info); Once again, I hope I've done this properly and that the information helps. Thank you, -- Josh Smith

4.8 Sparc64 rtadvd crash

. Please let me know if there is any other relevant information I can provide. Thanks, -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber:B juice...@gmail.com phone:B 304.237.9369(c)

Re: OpenBSD on plugcomputers

it's not been a horrible platform to play around with and use for some minor home automation tasks. -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com phone: 304.237.9369(c)

Re: IPv6 status

with it on. Thanks, Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber:B juice...@gmail.com phone:B 304.237.9369(c)

Re: nat static-port option

snip -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com phone: 304.237.9369(c)

nat static-port option

the concept that this prevents pf from modifying the source port on the packets as they are natted. But I am curious as to what implications flipping this switch has. At least I'm guessing there must be something since it is not the default behavior. Thanks, -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber:B juice

Re: nat static-port option

and what the ramifications of using it are. As I stated before I'm guessing there is a good reason this isn't the default option for nat and I am curious as to why and any gotchas I should be on the look out for after enabling this option. snip Thanks, -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juice

Re: DNSSEC validating resolver

great and I'll be enabling it on my obsd clients but, correct me if I am wrong, this will do little to help protect the non obsd clients using my recursive resolvers. Thanks, Josh -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com phone: 304.237.9369(c)

Re: DNSSEC validating resolver

to support it and I thank everyone for the suggestions of using unbound from ports. Thanks, -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com phone: 304.237.9369(c)

Re: DNSSEC validating resolver

On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Oliver Peter li...@peter.de.com wrote: On 1/15/11 12:28 PM, Josh Smith wrote: I've got to say I'm suprised the dns server in the base system of the worlds most secure OS is not able to validate dnssec responses pkg_add unbound and you're done. B If you think

Re: DNSSEC validating resolver

On Saturday, January 15, 2011, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote: On 2011-01-14, Josh Smith juice...@gmail.com wrote: Has anyone had any luck configuring the bind included with 4.7 (named -v indicates it is 9.4.2-p2) as a DNSSEC validating resolver? B Some digging around the web

Re: DNSSEC validating resolver

/unbound will be replacing bind in base? Thanks, Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com phone: 304.237.9369(c) snip

Re: DNSSEC validating resolver

it :-) -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com phone: 304.237.9369(c)

DNSSEC validating resolver

Has anyone had any luck configuring the bind included with 4.7 (named -v indicates it is 9.4.2-p2) as a DNSSEC validating resolver? Some digging around the web indicates it might be to old to handle this properly. If so is the version included with 4.8 any newer? Thanks, Josh Smith KD8HRX email

Newbie Network/PF Question

in from the net pass out quick # allow outgoing traffic I'm sure I'm just missing a quick setting in my pf configuration or somewhere else on the box. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks, -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber:B juice...@gmail.com phone:B 304.237.9369(c)

Re: Newbie Network/PF Question

. Thanks, -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber:B juice...@gmail.com phone:B 304.237.9369(c) On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:16 PM, joshua stein j...@openbsd.org wrote: My network is configured as follows: gem0 - DHCP address and link to internet rl0 - 10.66.66.1/24 - original home network segment rl1

Re: Wifi host AP thoughts

(providing dhcp,dns, ntp, plus a few other services for a few small home networks) and then using a dedicated access point (linksys wrt54gl/ubiquiti networks/etc) as a wired - wireless bridge then actually using obsd as my access point. Thanks, -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber:B juice...@gmail.com

Re: [OT] Mail Archive Management

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Josh Rickmar joshua_rick...@eumx.netwrote: On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 08:07:45AM -0500, Josh Smith wrote: Dear Misc@, I have a largeish ( around 10 gb) mail archive stored in a mbox file and it's starting to get a bit unwieldy to maintain, it's difficult

Re: [OT] Mail Archive Management

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Joachim Schipper joac...@joachimschipper.nl wrote: On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 08:07:45AM -0500, Josh Smith wrote: Dear Misc@, I have a largeish ( around 10 gb) mail archive stored in a mbox file and it's starting to get a bit unwieldy to maintain, it's

[OT] Mail Archive Management

be better off maintaining this in a maildir? If so what are my options for conversion? Weather or not I keep it in mbox format or convert it to something else - what sort of tools are out there to break it up into multiple archives by year or perhaps sender? Thanks, Josh -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email

Re: OT - gmail alternatives

Unfortunately it appears that lavabit isn't accepting new users at the moment. Their service does look interesting tho. Thanks, Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com phone: 304.237.9369(c) On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Adam M. Dutko dutko.a...@gmail.com wrote: How do

Re: OpenBSD Access Point?

+---+ -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com phone: 304.237.9369(c)

Re: Are there any Open Source / Free Software vt220 / vt320 / vt400 terminal emulators out there?

from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com Josh Smith email/jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: 304.237.9369(c) () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments