hey there, -I messed with this alot in 3.0 when it came out and think I
was the first person to ask Dan about it when testing was going on for
3.0 snapshot. I mean, I lived to wake up and make bridges with pf.
-but, alas, that was years ago, and from my hazy memory all I used to do
was this:
Basically since this is openbsd, my last obsd box came with chrooted
'named' already present on the machine.
I edited the config files named.conf, dropped in a 'zone file' for
mydomain.com, with the proper syntax, serial number (today's date with a
01 as: 2007060601), and restarted
Suzuki Kawasaki wrote:
If OpenBSD is the most uber secure why does it run on Solaris?
http://www.openbsd.org was running Apache on Solaris when last queried at
18-May-2007 19:52:41 GMT - refresh now Site Report
Also, is someone going to change the topic on #openbsd on all servers
worldwide?
I have been using domainpeople.com mainly because they are canadian,
(e.g. not greedy and impossible to get in touch with like many
registrars in my own country, and home of the coolest open source OS
project on the planet).
they are easy to get in touch with (they have a phone number
Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 11:20:27AM -0700, Darren Spruell wrote:
On 1/15/07, Alexander Bochmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...on Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 08:42:35AM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
hmm, why are people so proud of their uptimes when it only show they
Diana Eichert wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:07:16 +0100, Patrick Useldinger
SNIP
True. I'm currently evaluating OpenBSD and I am trying to understand the
mindset of OpenBSD users by reading the newsgroups. And this thread *is*
strange.
Patrick, I guess I don't understand why someone
I started with OBSD 2.5, reading a book on making an invisible
firewall. I remember because my associate flew up from Orange County CA
to SF to show me and my friend how to install openbsd on the quick
(basically get through fdisk and cylinder settings). Didn't even order
pizza, we were
Marc Balmer wrote:
* Christopher Snell wrote:
Hi Folks,
I hope you will excuse the commercial nature of this post; I figured
that this is the best place to find what we are looking for.
looking for people myself, I must admit that I dislike abusing misc for
this a bit, misc@ is for
Is there a specific way to set a name server so that clients are always
*forced* to use an autoritative name server?
UltraDNS and some others have mentioned little features they have, but it hints
at the possibility that somewhere in the DNS spec.
-krb
9 matches
Mail list logo
