Re: mbuf leak with rl

Of Matthew R. Dempsky Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:37 PM To: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: mbuf leak with rl On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:29:10AM -0500, Karle, Chris wrote: That looks suspect to me; that seems like a lot for cable modem level traffic. I'd check if your mbufs number ever

mbuf leak with rl

Is anyone using a Realtek 8139 card with OpenBSD 3.9? I noticed that mbufs will slowly leak when using it. I noticed this after switching to 3.9. I don't know if something happened to the card or not... maybe there is a hardware error now that is making it behave funky. If you're using a rl*

Re: mbuf leak with rl

I mentioned this in a different post too; I should have included it in my original message. My rl interface is on a cable modem, which tend to be very chatty with ARP traffic. The output of netstat -m ever increases; I ran a cronjob which captured it. After about 10-12 days the network would

Re: complex.h under OpenBSD

find /usr/include | xargs grep __real__ led me to: /usr/include/g++/complex -Original Message- From: Ramiro Aceves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 10:49 AM To: misc@openbsd.org Subject: complex.h under OpenBSD Hello dear OpenBSD fans. I am trying to

Re: question about duplicate rules in pf and altq

I think the manual says the last filter rule to match takes precedence, unless it's NAT rules, then it's the first. Also, I've found pftop as a great firewall rule debugging aid. -Chris -Original Message- From: John Blaze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 7:16

Re: interrupt comparison

100Mbps is the max the line can carry including interframe gap, preamble, and CRC, which with 64 byte packets add up to about ~22Mbps. I don't know the utils you used to test. What sized packets would that create? -Original Message- From: Andreas Bihlmaier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]