Hi there,
is there any weight to this new story on slashdot
http://it.slashdot.org/it/08/10/01/0127245.shtml
about a new attacker possible to break any tcp stack? Sounds rather
shady, so here I am, perhaps you guys have your ears closer to the ground
Regards
I have successfully used the below Nic's on 4.3 and 4.4 -current setups
(especially the 4 port version)
http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/servers/networking/index-nic.html
They go well with the HP DL range in my experience.
Example the HP DL385 will give you 4 PCI express lanes i.e 16
I can relate to that, having load balancers fixing backend services.
If you have the time, you will probably find pound reverse proxy
http://www.apsis.ch/pound/ to be a nice alternative to try out in your lab.
I have pound on openbsd for several years and can recommend it for http
- https
I'm in the process of setting up a redundant reverse proxy cluster for
someone.
Currently the setup is working in a single box non redundant setup and
everything is perfect and purring nicely.
What I want it to ultimately do:
I want to load balance the 2 boxes with carp and each box in their
4 matches
Mail list logo