-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(another meaning of auto-reply?)
Markus Wernig wrote:
|
| problem 2) is a bit strange. I'll start with the network layout:
| [...]
|
| - unplug cable on OBSD 1 (.49) : carpipsec fails over to OBSD 2
| - plug cable back in : carp fails back over
recompiling sshd with
includes.h:#define USE_PIPES 1
removed would also help.
i think it's better to fix ppp(8)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toni Mueller wrote:
| I can't see why this must be so. HTTPS can be proxied with Squid which
| somehow handles the crypto stuff after reading the client's CONNECT
| ..., and digging into FTP+SSL suggests that the control channel could
| be used to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toni Mueller wrote:
| Hi,
|
| On Thu, 01.09.2005 at 19:29:57 +0200, Markus Wernig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
|Squid is different. Usually, it doesn't do SSL itself, but just passes
|the connection on.
| it does, however, talk SSL to the outside
Markus
it will work in 3.8 and later.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:14:32AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
Can you please confirm if it is possible to set the mtu on cards
using the sis driver (I have a Netgear FA311, based on the DP 83816
chip)?
I am trying to change the mtu with:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
The sharedkey directive in sasyncd.conf requires an aes key. I just
can't seem to find out how to create such a key :-{ Or is it just 32
bytes of random data?
Any pointers anyone, please?
/m
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 05:02:05PM +0200, umaxx wrote:
# ifconfig tun0 create
# ifconfig tun0 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 up
try
ifconfig tun0 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 link0
check brconfig(8)
link2 Setting this flag causes all packets to be passed on to ipsec(4)
for processing, based on the policies established by the adminis-
trator using the ipsecadm(8) command. If appropriate security
associations (SAs) exist, they
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Niclas Sodergard wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I'm having trouble with our firewalls. They are both Dell 2850 with
| identical hardware inside (dmesg below). I have five carp interfaces
| connected to five different em interfaces. carp0,2,3,4 works fine
| (master
numbers as the
original one or do they have new ones?
You see: The openbsd software management concept is rather arcane to me.
Would somebody shed a little light for a lost soul? Hints? Pointers? Howtos?
Thank you
/markus
Theo de Raadt wrote:
1) With the above install lots of software came onto my disk that I do
not want nor need (named, httpd, inetd ...). How can I get rid of those
in a consistent way, since they don't show in pkg_info?
You don't get rid of it. Is it hurting you? It is not even denting
Jason Crawford wrote:
How about read the faq (http://www.openbsd.org/faq/index.html), and
start reading the very well written man pages
Ah, I just rtfm knew this had to happen. Believe me, I wouldn't have
even dared to bother you if I hadn't been doing exactly that for the
last two days.
the TCP client reuses a source port and sends a SYN while the
server still has the old TIME_WAIT state, so the server does not
send a SYN/ACK.
after 6 seconds the client retransmits the SYN and the connect
succeeds.
so there are 2 problems:
1) the client reuses the port too soon.
markus
Am Montag, 6. Juni 2005 16:41 schrieben Sie:
afaiR, ldif files can't have blank lines
nonsense.
slapadd: could not parse entry (line=421)
added:
ou=addr,uid=markert,ou=Users,ou=OxObjects,dc=suchtreffer,dc=de
(0019)
but the line 421 is empty. strange.
What do the entries
Theo de Raadt wrote on Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 08:51:58 -0600:
Fine, talk what you want about.
But something you should think about is this:
It is a good idea if OpenBSD developers read these mailing lists too,
for ideas as to what to change or fix. But if the lists are just
yammerings by
Otto Moerbeek wrote on Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 08:10:42 +0200:
On Tue, 31 May 2005, Markus Kolb wrote:
And maybe you should return from anarchy to democracy a little bit.
If have no idea what political term fits best, but OpenBSD is not a
democracy. We value some people's opinions more
Shane J Pearson wrote on Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 15:49:55 +1000:
Markus,
On 01/06/2005, at 1:17 AM, Markus Kolb wrote:
Well, if OBSD would done the compiler flagging right then I wouldn't
have to do it myself.
I believe OpenBSD has done it right. The official stance is that they
won't
Brad wrote on Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 09:18:54 -0400:
There are no compilation limitations of OBSD.
There are. Have a look at the net/ser port for example.
And I will show you in core after I've had a deeper look.
Otto Moerbeek wrote on Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 17:10:44 +0200:
If we feel that certain posts just add noise and nothing else, we say so.
You don't know after 2 mails that it will be only noise. And with your
flaming you kill a thread before it starts to become interesting.
I have already written:
of anyoneelse
isn't good style.
So maybe there are a few people who knows about and want to have a
technical talk.
Markus
Hi,
do you have any information why there are problems in OBSD kernel if
using -march=i486 GCC option for GENERIC kernel compilation?
Parts of the kernel are unuseable.
Thank you
Markus
Joel Dinel wrote on Mon, May 30, 2005 at 14:51:04 -0400:
On 5/30/05, Markus Kolb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
do you have any information why there are problems in OBSD kernel if
using -march=i486 GCC option for GENERIC kernel compilation?
Parts of the kernel are unuseable.
Read
/sd0i.
Greetings
Markus
601 - 625 of 625 matches
Mail list logo
