I think as long as one side of the tunnel is not doing NAT then you would
be okay. For a while I had an IPSEC VPN going between my cloud server and
my home desktop so that I could access my home desktop remotely and it
worked well. Although, I have never tried any layer two tunneling. Report
back
You could also consider using etherip(4). I think the etherip(4) interface
might be more NAT tolerant but I am not really sure.
Just saw today that the copyright notice on the website is from
1996-2017. You guys might want to update it to 2018. :-)
-Matt
, Mar 24, 2018 at 09:51:59AM -0400, Matt Schwartz wrote:
Hi tech@,
One small correction to relayd.conf(5). In the examples section for
TLS acceleration, the configuration option match hash "sessid" results
in a syntax error. Diff below.
Thanks,
Matt
hi.
i'm having trouble getting anyo
ot;$TIMEOUT"
tcp { nodelay, sack, socket buffer 65536, backlog 128 }
tls { no tlsv1.0, ciphers HIGH }
tls no session tickets
}
relay ghost {
listen on vio0 port 443 tls
protocol https
forward to 127.0.0.1 port 2368
}
On 4/7/2018 3:32 AM, Cla
Hi misc@
I am running relayd as a reverse TLS proxy on OpenBSD 6.3 release with
the GENERIC kernel. I have noticed two issues that happen: (1) netstat
reports that the Recv-q for the ip protocol steadily climbs and never
goes back to 0 unless I restart relayd and (2) I am getting a lot of
Okay, I wasn't screaming - cheering on a great operating system, most
definitely. I'll dig into the source code a bit to see what I can learn.
On Apr 9, 2016 9:12 PM, "Jiri B" wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 08:18:11PM -0400, Matt Schwartz wrote:
> > I really lik
I really like the bioctl full disk encryption feature. I would love to see
it extended to support multiple users/passkeys. I once worked with a
commercial full disk encryption product that allowed this and could even be
managed over a network. Coming up with a solution to manage encryption keys
Is it possible to setup a multi-site BGP MPLS VPN? Currently, I have it
working great between two sites running OpenBSD 5.9-current. I tried adding
a third site to my simulation but it hasn't worked. The third site I have
sharing the same MPLS label and routing domain. Is this where I am going
ipcomp has not been implemented in ipsec/isakmpd. I've gotten it to work
quite well with iked. iked is the key management daemon for IKEv2.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Motty Cruz wrote:
> configuring ipsec.conf with ipcomp seem to be difficult then I thought. I
> enable ipcomp
> # sysctl -a
Seems like there might be an outage. I cannot reach either openbsd.org or
openssh.com.
On Mar 15, 2016 9:32 AM, "Rudolf Sykora" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> is it only I who cannot connect to either
> of openbsd.org and openssh.com, or
> is the server down?
>
> Thanks
> Ruda
I am running OpenBSD 5.8 Release and I have a very simple BGP MPLS VPN
setup. I'm close to getting it to work but for bgpd. I think I have my
bgpd.conf setup correctly but I'm still having difficulty. Below I gave as
much diagnostic info as I could think of. Kindly let me know if I am
missing
the
default. Frustrating because I'm so close to getting BGP MPLS VPN to work.
Of course it still could be me but I've looked at this 6 ways to Saturday
and I'm at a loss.
> On Mar 9, 2016 6:00 AM, "Tony Sarendal" wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > 2016-03-08 15:38 GMT+01:00 Matt Schwa
Jeker" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:29:48AM -0500, Matt Schwartz wrote:
> > Thank you much, Claudio! That was the ticket. I had put my depend on
mpe0
> > in the wrong place. I was mostly using your mpls example. Dumb
questions:
> > Why do you not create a defaul
I did not even know it was broken?
On Mar 8, 2016 1:26 AM, "Tony Sarendal" wrote:
>
> Is there any chance of getting "network inet connected" fixed to 5.9 ?
>
> Regards Tony
Thank you much, Claudio! That was the ticket. I had put my depend on mpe0
in the wrong place. I was mostly using your mpls example. Dumb questions:
Why do you not create a default route in rdomain 1 on the 2nd PE in your
mpls example network? Why do you not have network 0.0.0.0/0 on the 2nd PE?
Hello @misc,
I am running OpenBSD 5.8 release and I am finding that BGPD is not adding
routes. When I type bgpctl show rib, I don't see any routes added. Did I
goof up this configuration? Below are my bgpd.conf files. I do not even see
any routes added when I run route -T1 show. I have no
Hi. I don't see that option available for kernel pppoe. I see it for a
userland version. man 4 pppoe shows the same as man 8 pppoe.
On Jul 14, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Mitja MuEeniD
mi...@muzenic.net wrote:
Sounds like you didn't clamp the MSS, see man 4 pppoe towards the end. It's
not a
Thank you everyone. I cannot believe I forgot to set up that static route
from the DSL modem back to the 10.40.60.0 network. Works like a charm. Next
comes ipv6!
On Jul 9, 2010, at 2:31 PM, Jussi Peltola pe...@pelzi.net wrote:
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 02:19:42PM -0700, Matt S wrote:
Given
I will get that dmesg together. Discovered that it just doesn't want to
work on amd64 platform. I booted with an i386 cdrom and the card was
discovered. Bummer thing is that I won't be able to take advantage of my
Quad core with 8GB ram. That said, OpenBSD offers everything I want and
need in
Hello,
I have the intel q35 on-board graphics card and am tearing my hair out
to get it to work. Dmesg finds it but states that it is not
configured??. X errors out with a cannot allocate video ram error.
Unfortunately, I am not in a position to post my logs just yet. Could
someone at
21 matches
Mail list logo
