Re: Possible sasyncd memory leak ?

2019-03-09 Thread Michał Koc
W dniu 09.03.2019 o 12:43, Otto Moerbeek pisze: On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 12:10:34PM +0100, Michał Koc wrote: W dniu 09.03.2019 o 08:15, Otto Moerbeek pisze: On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 12:03:25PM +0100, Michał Koc wrote: Hi all, We have a triple redundant vpn gateway setup with sasyncd running

Re: Possible sasyncd memory leak ?

2019-03-09 Thread Michał Koc
W dniu 09.03.2019 o 08:15, Otto Moerbeek pisze: On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 12:03:25PM +0100, Michał Koc wrote: Hi all, We have a triple redundant vpn gateway setup with sasyncd running and tons of tunnels, about 1000 flows. Looking at the graph of memory usage, you can clearly see

Possible sasyncd memory leak ?

2019-03-08 Thread Michał Koc
Hi all, We have a triple redundant vpn gateway setup with sasyncd running and tons of tunnels, about 1000 flows. Looking at the graph of memory usage, you can clearly see that something is sucking up the memory. The graph can be viewed here: https://pasteboard.co/I4sjzQ8.jpg Looking at

Re: Openbsd 6.1 and Current Console Freezes and lockup Proxmox PVE5.0

2017-10-19 Thread Michał Koc
-- Wiadomość oryginalna -- *Temat: *Re: Openbsd 6.1 and Current Console Freezes and lockup Proxmox PVE5.0 *Nadawca: *Mike Larkin <mlar...@azathoth.net> *Adresat: *Michał Koc <m...@prime.pl> *Kopia: *misc@openbsd.org *Data: *19.10.2017 08:36 On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:0

Re: Openbsd 6.1 and Current Console Freezes and lockup Proxmox PVE5.0

2017-10-19 Thread Michał Koc
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:05:12PM +0200, Michał Koc wrote: On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 03:11:31PM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote: On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:36:42PM +0200, Michał Koc wrote: On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 01:23:36PM +0200, Michał Koc wrote: On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 11:59:52PM +0200, Oliver

Re: Openbsd 6.1 and Current Console Freezes and lockup Proxmox PVE5.0

2017-10-13 Thread Michał Koc
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 03:11:31PM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote: On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:36:42PM +0200, Michał Koc wrote: On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 01:23:36PM +0200, Michał Koc wrote: On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 11:59:52PM +0200, Oliver Marugg wrote: On 7 Oct 2017, at 22:01, Mike Larkin wrote

Re: Openbsd 6.1 and Current Console Freezes and lockup Proxmox PVE5.0

2017-10-12 Thread Michał Koc
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 01:23:36PM +0200, Michał Koc wrote: On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 11:59:52PM +0200, Oliver Marugg wrote: On 7 Oct 2017, at 22:01, Mike Larkin wrote: On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 02:19:58PM +0200, Oliver Marugg wrote: Just to add a 4th situation of hangs: Login via proxmox (pve

Re: Openbsd 6.1 and Current Console Freezes and lockup Proxmox PVE5.0

2017-10-12 Thread Michał Koc
On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 11:59:52PM +0200, Oliver Marugg wrote: On 7 Oct 2017, at 22:01, Mike Larkin wrote: On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 02:19:58PM +0200, Oliver Marugg wrote: Just to add a 4th situation of hangs: Login via proxmox (pve)/kvm serial console (via noVNC), login successful: Vm guest in

Re: isakmpd dies quietly with over 100 tunnels

2017-05-30 Thread Michał Koc
Hi Stuart, Rising openfiles-cur does not change anything. Best Regards M.K. -- Wiadomość oryginalna -- *Temat: *Re: isakmpd dies quietly with over 100 tunnels *Nadawca: *Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> *Adresat: *misc@openbsd.org *Data: *30.05.2017 11:55 On 2017-05-28,

Re: isakmpd dies quietly with over 100 tunnels

2017-05-29 Thread Michał Koc
/isakmpd/isakmpd.c:533 (gdb) Best regards M.K. -- Wiadomość oryginalna -- *Temat: *Re: isakmpd dies quietly with over 100 tunnels *Nadawca: *Michał Koc <m...@prime.pl> *Adresat: *Alexis VACHETTE <avache...@sisteer.com>, Theo de Raadt <dera...@openbsd.org>, Florian Ermisch <florian

Re: isakmpd dies quietly with over 100 tunnels

2017-05-29 Thread Michał Koc
enbsd.org>, Florian Ermisch <florian.ermi...@mailbox.org> *Kopia: *<misc@openbsd.org>, Michał Koc <m...@prime.pl> *Data: *29.05.2017 11:31 I didn't think it was isakmpd related back then. Maybe a configuration issue on my end or the partner's. But sure we need to post traces. Non

isakmpd dies quietly with over 100 tunnels

2017-05-28 Thread Michał Koc
Hi all, I'm running 6.0/amd64 inside KVM/Quemu with over 100 ipsec tunnels. Everything was running just fine when the number of tunnels was lower. But as we have been setting up more and more tunnels we suddenly run on problems. The isakmpd deaemon keeps dying quietly. Probably I'm running

Re: what happened to the encap address_family

2015-05-15 Thread Michał Koc
Tank You for the authoritative answer, so we will have to get used to the, let say new, ipsecctl output. Also good to know that monitoring tools have to look some elsewhere to see VPN and routing is up :) Instead of waking 12 people at 1:00 AM :) Anyway, in my opinion this king of exercises

Re: what happened to the encap address_family

2015-05-15 Thread Michał Koc
Hi misc, Let me repeat myself: anyone CAPABLE to answer (and understand the question) ? I really admire and appreciate your (misc) commitment. Best regards Michał Koc -- Wiadomość oryginalna -- *Temat: *Re: what happened to the encap address_family *Nadawca: *Fred

Re: what happened to the encap address_family

2015-05-15 Thread Michał Koc
Hello misc, anyone capable to answer ? Best regards Michał Koc -- Wiadomość oryginalna -- *Temat: *what happened to the encap address_family *Nadawca: *Boris Goldberg bo...@twopoint.com *Adresat: *misc@openbsd.org *Data: *2015-05-14 18:14 Hello misc, The encap address_family

Re: Time keeping problem

2014-12-02 Thread Michał Koc
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 17:33, Michał Koc wrote: Hi All, I've got a OpenBSD installation on Microsoft Hyper-V, and there is a strange issue related to time. Actually the clock seems to be running fine, but all of the sleep operations expire 2 times too fast. cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot

Time keeping problem

2014-12-01 Thread Michał Koc
Hi All, I've got a OpenBSD installation on Microsoft Hyper-V, and there is a strange issue related to time. Actually the clock seems to be running fine, but all of the sleep operations expire 2 times too fast. I.e.: # date; sleep 60; date Mon Dec 1 18:23:18 CET 2014 Mon Dec 1 18:23:48 CET

Re: Freeze with Western Digital Caviar Green HDD

2010-12-15 Thread Michał Koc
Can't say anything bad about WD Raid Edition drives. Currently I've go over 100 of them without any problems. Thou I've found some of them generating small number of Raw Read Error Rate, but only in 2TB model WDC WD2002FYPS. I've got much worse experience with Seagate My policy

Re: re(4)/atom freezes (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: OpenBSD 4.8 freezes on certain activities)

2010-11-12 Thread Michał Koc
Hello, wait a second, I'll be able to test tomorrow, will give the result instantly best regards M.K. W dniu 2010-11-12 22:32, Stuart Henderson pisze: [moving from misc to tech@, reply-to set] On 2010-11-12, Stuart Hendersons...@spacehopper.org wrote: On 2010-11-11, Micha??

Re: re(4)/atom freezes (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: OpenBSD 4.8 freezes on certain activities)

2010-11-12 Thread Michał Koc
Well, it looks like the patch did the trick :) thanks a lot :) shouldn't it get to Tag OpenBSD_4_8, so everyone can benefit ? correct me if I'm wrong, but re(4) seems to be a popular interface best regards M.K. W dniu 2010-11-12 22:32, Stuart Henderson pisze: [moving from misc to tech@,

Re: [SOLVED] Re: OpenBSD 4.8 freezes on certain activities

2010-11-11 Thread Michał Koc
Yes, it does. regards M.K. W dniu 2010-11-11 10:53, Stuart Henderson pisze: On 2010-11-10, Micha?? Kocm...@prime.pl wrote: Hi All, migrating from re to em solved the network problem With the re(4), does the system recover if you leave it for a couple of minutes?

[SOLVED] Re: OpenBSD 4.8 freezes on certain activities

2010-11-10 Thread Michał Koc
Hi All, migrating from re to em solved the network problem best regards m.k. W dniu 2010-11-03 12:17, MichaE Koc pisze: Hi All, I've just upgraded two of my OpenBSD machines to 4.8: hw.machine=i386 hw.model=Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class)

Re: OpenBSD 4.8 freezes on certain activities

2010-11-05 Thread Michał Koc
Thank You for your time. The patch seems to resolve both problems on Atom platform. Will check Core2Duo later. Thanks once again Best regard M.K. W dniu 2010-11-05 18:36, Bob Beck pisze: Are you able to try the following? see if it solves your problem. Index: sys/kern/vfs_bio.c

Re: OpenBSD 4.8 freezes on certain activities

2010-11-05 Thread Michał Koc
Hmmm, I was a little bit too optimistic. The hight disk IO seems not to cause problems now, but network io (re adapter) from nagios(probably) has freezed the Atom machine after approximately 2 hours. This is top header right after freeze: 75 processes: 1 running, 70 idle, 4 on processor

OpenBSD 4.8 freezes on certain activities

2010-11-03 Thread Michał Koc
Hi All, I've just upgraded two of my OpenBSD machines to 4.8: hw.machine=i386 hw.model=Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) hw.product=DG31PR and hw.machine=i386 hw.model=Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU D510 @ 1.66GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) hw.product=D510MO Dmesgs

Ami and OpenBSD 4.4 AMD64 SMP satbility

2008-11-15 Thread Michał Koc
Hi, I've just tested SRCS28X witch is a ami0 raid controller with OpenBSD 4.4 errata 005 on fallowing architectures: - i386 - i386 SMP - amd64 - amd64 SMP It occurs that dd uf=/dev/zero of=/test to the filesystem mounted on ami0 freezes the system on amd64/SMP only. This behavior is repetitive.

Apache and probably other problems - OpenBSD 4.4

2008-11-04 Thread Michał Koc
Hi, I've just set up two 4.4 boxes, i386 and amd64 on same king of hardware. I've started bundled apache and compiled ab from apache 2.2.10 The problem is that ab stops after about 100 requests with error: ab started on local machine: apr_socket_connect(): Connection refused (61) ab started on

Re: make build fails for OPENBSD_4_4 on i386

2008-08-08 Thread Michał Koc
is it ? according to man release: OPENBSD_x_y_BASE This tag marks the source as it exists on the release CD-ROM where x is the major release number and y is the minor release number. OPENBSD_x_y This tag is a moving target. It

Re: relayd and src track

2008-05-17 Thread Michał Koc
Hi, Looking into pf_ioctl.c and pfvar.h I've found that there is an undocumented (for some unknown reason) IOCTL - DIOCKILLSRCNODES. Further investigation revealed that it's purpose is to remove single node from source tracking tree. So the simplest way is find out what connections should be

Re: relayd and src track

2008-05-17 Thread Michał Koc
Due to some problems witch patch formatting in mail agent it is also available at http://www.prime.pl/relayd.diff regards MichaE Koc Pierre-Yves Ritschard pisze: + if (rdr-conf.flags F_STICKY) + if (ioctl(env-sc_pf-dev, DIOCCLRSRCNODES, 0) == -1) +

Re: relayd and src track

2008-05-16 Thread Michał Koc
Hi, actually it is enough to clear the tree of source tracking nodes right after syncing tables, so the sticky-address is stored again. Unfortunately there is one disadvantage, all sources will be flushed, so some connections can be assigned to different hosts. But I think it's better then

Re: Intel DQ35MP

2008-01-11 Thread Michał Koc
Hi, Using drive 0, partition 3. Loading... probing: pc0 apm mem[635K 3573M 16K a20=on] disk: hd0+ OpenBSD/i386 BOOT 3.01 boot machine memory Region 0: type 1 at 0x1000 for 635KB Region 1: type 2 at 0x9fc00 for 1KB Region 2: type 2 at 0xe for 128KB Region 3: type 1 at 0x10 for 3659244KB

Re: Intel DQ35MP

2008-01-10 Thread Michał Koc
Hello I've noticed this problem on many different INTEL motherboard models. Debugging showed that under the address where acpi structures should be are actually zeros. So there is probably some memory mapping problem. regards M.K. Marcos Laufer pisze: Hello , i tried updating the BIOS to the

Re: Fatal page fault during boot on Toshiba A200 1M7 and X200-21K

2007-12-21 Thread Michał Koc
Hi, same problem on Toshiba x200-21k, memory tested for 24h by memtest, so I assume it's okey regards M.K. Jack J. Woehr pisze: Possible motherboard hardware problems (PCI controller), or possibly memory problems? (( pcibios0: bad IRQ table checksum )) On Dec 21, 2007, at 1:28 PM, Key

Re: Tool for HD analyzing

2007-09-28 Thread Michał Koc
Peter N. M. Hansteen pisze: Leonardo Marques [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've a HD which are returning a lot of errors. Someone know some good tool to analyze this disk and tell me if i've to replace it or if exist some way to repair it? To my mind that kind of errors say run, don't

Intel motherboards and ACPI

2007-09-16 Thread Michał Koc
Hello everyone, I have a bunch of machines based on Intel motherboards, most of them are D945GCNL, but unfortunately I'm not able to use SMP because of ACPI problems. Beside the kernel side problems, acpidump outputs a strange error: RSDT is corrupted. Can someone tell me if there is any

Re: Intel motherboards and ACPI

2007-09-16 Thread Michał Koc
Hi, yes, I've already googled for the issue and found this one, but it does not help. I think it is whole another problem. regards M.K. Chris Kuethe pisze: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=118975639013313w=2 On 9/16/07, Micha3 Koc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello everyone, I have a

Re: Intel motherboards and ACPI

2007-09-16 Thread Michał Koc
Hello, Well, actually I've already tried this without any luck. The problem lies somewhere deeper, I was trying to get at least acpidump working, and what I found is, that RSD PTR looks fine, but under address pointed by rs-addr all I can find are zeroes. May be a problem with physical memory

Sensors problem

2007-04-02 Thread Michał Koc
Hello, I've a problem with sensors on one of my machines, it seems to be coming from ichiic slave detection. The machine is: INTEL BLKD865GSAL motherboard hw.product=D865GSA It contains a Winbond W83627EHG chip, witch is the lead-free version of W83627EHF - supported by OpenBSD (google says

Re: PF SMP

2006-06-30 Thread Michał Koc
OpenBSD SMP is based on BigLock, so only one processor at the time can execute kernel code, and IP Stack is kernel side only. As far as I remember. regards M.K. Gustavo Rios napisaE(a): I have the same understanding you have Pachl. I believe OpenBSD IP Stack is not multithreaded implemented.

OpenBSD Not booting on E7230 chipset

2006-05-26 Thread Michał Koc
Hello, I tried to boot OpenBSD on E7230 chipset, but no luck so faar. System hangs during device recognition in random moments. Strange thing is that cursor jumps to the center of the screen. Has anyone managed to run OpenBSD on E7230 chipset ? regards M.K. [demime 1.01d removed an

3Ware 9500S-12

2006-03-24 Thread Michał Koc
Hello, can someone confirm that 3Ware 9500S-12 does or does not work with OpenBSD ? I'd also appreciate any suggestion about 12-channel sata raid solutions. Regards M.K.

Re: 3Ware 9500S-12

2006-03-24 Thread Michał Koc
Shane J Pearson napisaE(a): Hi MichaE, On 2006.02.24, at 10:24 PM, MichaE Koc wrote: can someone confirm that 3Ware 9500S-12 does or does not work with OpenBSD ? Based on what I last I heard, I think the most important point is that 3Ware the company, does not work with OpenBSD the

Re: em0 and SMP problem

2005-07-04 Thread Michał Koc
One more question: is ist matter of wrong irq assigment ?? em0 at pci2 dev 2 function 0 Intel PRO/1000XT (82544EI) rev 0x02: apic 8 int 9 (irq 9), address: 00:0e:0c:70:c9:52 em1 at pci2 dev 5 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT (82546EB) rev 0x01: apic 8 int 9 (irq 9), address: 00:03:47:32:c8:ca

Re: em0 and SMP problem

2005-07-04 Thread Michał Koc
Yes, the problem lies in interrupts, I've just tried xl, fxp and rl Nic's, and none of them works as em. Furthermore their interrupts are not showed in vmstat -i. It would be very helpfull if some wise guy could tell me where to look for the problem. Otherwise I'll have to go thru the kernel

Re: em0 and SMP problem

2005-07-02 Thread Michał Koc
Here You have dmesg from 3.6 SP before patch: I'll provide 3.7 sp, smp, after and before patch tomorrow. Thank You. MichaE Koc OpenBSD 3.6-stable (GENERIC) #0: Mon Mar 7 14:01:06 CET 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.66GHz

Re: em0 and SMP problem 3.7 SMP DMESG and ifconfig

2005-07-02 Thread Michał Koc
OpenBSD 3.7-stable (STORAGE.MP) #1: Sat Jul 2 21:29:32 CEST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/STORAGE.MP cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.66GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2.66 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CF real mem =

em0 and SMP problem

2005-07-01 Thread Michał Koc
Hello all, I've a problem with em0 (and eventually any other nic connected to the pci bus) on double Xeon, while I run smp kernel. I have no idea what could couse it, there was problem with ICU but I've fixed it as follows: pcibios0: no compatible PCI ICU found: ICU vendor 0x8086 product

Re: em0 and SMP problem

2005-07-01 Thread Michał Koc
Ok, starting from the beginnig, The em nics are visible in dmesg and ifconfig. They do transmit packets as I can see in tcpdump on the destination machine. But they do not recive any packets. ie. I ping from SMP machine to dest on dest I can se echo requests comming from SMP and echo replies