On 09/08/16 12:26, Momtchil Momtchev wrote:
On 09/08/16 03:03, Darren Tucker wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:56:15AM +1000, Darren Tucker wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 02:46:44PM +0200, Momtchil Momtchev wrote:
[...] .
Also what I find very puzzling is that lower IRQ rates lead
On 09/08/16 03:03, Darren Tucker wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:56:15AM +1000, Darren Tucker wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 02:46:44PM +0200, Momtchil Momtchev wrote:
[...]
What is the problem with software interrupt moderation? That it has a
fixed timer while the hardware one scales
On 09/08/16 03:03, Darren Tucker wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:56:15AM +1000, Darren Tucker wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 02:46:44PM +0200, Momtchil Momtchev wrote:
[...]
A quick test with this diff (just routing through it, no PF, no pool
debug) gives me:
$ iperf -c host -i 10 -t 60
On 04/08/16 09:13, Darren Tucker wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Momtchil Momtchev <momtc...@momtchev.com> wrote:
Does anyone with a working knowledge of re(4) have any idea why the PC
Engines APU NICs perform so poorly in OpenBSD?
Most likely lack of hardware interrupt mode
Hello,
Does anyone with a working knowledge of re(4) have any idea why the
PC Engines APU NICs perform so poorly in OpenBSD? Throughput is 300 to
320 MBit/s with about 30 pf rules, NAT and 1 states when running
5.9. This is much less than an APU running Linux or FreeBSD or an
erface?
This is why I have a hard time finding the origin of those ARP requests.
So this is my real question, who sends ARP requests directly on the
bridge via bridge_output()?
Thank you and I hope that I was clear enough.
On 22/11/15 20:37, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 22/11/15(Sun) 18:30, Momt
On 23/11/15 16:01, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 23/11/15(Mon) 12:57, Momtchil Momtchev wrote:
[...]
That seems to be a known regression on 5.8 because re(4) supports
hardware VLAN. The problem is that bridge_input() is called before
vlan_input() for every packet received on a physical interface
On 22/11/2015 15:52, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
btw., what OpenBSD version is this diff for? This is not -current.
Thanks for the quick reply. That was my impression too, but it seems
that bridge_output is also used sometimes for forwarding ARP requests by a
code path that I haven't found
On 22/11/2015 17:48, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 22/11/15(Sun) 16:56, Momtchil Momtchev wrote:
On 22/11/2015 15:52, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
When you say "the bridge changed somewhat" are you saying that you see
a regression? Could you share your setup that, I guess work with 4.9,
and
Hello,
Sorry for what may appear to be a strange question, but shouldn't
there be a check against IFBIF_BLOCKNONIP in bridge_output() in
sys/net/if_bridge.c?
Something like this :
--- if_bridge.c.origTue Jul 21 00:54:29 2015
+++ if_bridge.c Sat Nov 21 16:05:12 2015
@@
On 22/11/2015 00:34, Reyk Floeter wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 04:22:51PM +0100, Momtchil Momtchev wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for what may appear to be a strange question, but shouldn't there
be a check against IFBIF_BLOCKNONIP in bridge_output() in
sys/net/if_bridge.c?
Why
11 matches
Mail list logo
