Re: Intel Atom D510MO performance issue

2010-02-25 Thread Noah McNallie
was going on). Noah McNallie n0ah

Re: softdeps enabled = poor concurrent access?

2010-02-24 Thread Noah McNallie
On 02/24/2010 05:10 AM, Tobias Ulmer wrote: On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:52:05AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote: On Feb 23 19:20:28, Noah McNallie wrote: Hey guys. Noah here. I'd like to use openbsd on an older machine i have. I've had it on there before and never tested something that i've been testing

Re: softdeps enabled = poor concurrent access?

2010-02-24 Thread Noah McNallie
On 02/24/2010 04:52 AM, Jan Stary wrote: On Feb 23 19:20:28, Noah McNallie wrote: Hey guys. Noah here. I'd like to use openbsd on an older machine i have. I've had it on there before and never tested something that i've been testing on various operating systems lately. That's how well they do

Re: softdeps enabled = poor concurrent access?

2010-02-24 Thread Noah McNallie
for not having a disk scheduler. and i still adore it, my next bat is at how to remove it's security implementations to speed it up. Noah McNallie n0ah

softdeps enabled = poor concurrent access?

2010-02-23 Thread Noah McNallie
without sofdeps. Any help leading to a sollution is more than apreciated! Noah McNallie n0ah

Re: softdeps enabled = poor concurrent access?

2010-02-23 Thread Noah McNallie
required as it speeds up something like the extraction of a tarball exponentially. I'm guessing somewhere near 25x. It's very slow on this machine without sofdeps. Any help leading to a sollution is more than apreciated! Noah McNallie n0ah I will try this tomorrow. Noah McNallie n0ah

Re: softdeps enabled = poor concurrent access?

2010-02-23 Thread Noah McNallie
required as it speeds up something like the extraction of a tarball exponentially. I'm guessing somewhere near 25x. It's very slow on this machine without sofdeps. Any help leading to a sollution is more than apreciated! Noah McNallie n0ah if by -current snapshot you mean openbsd 4.6 then yes