Hello all,
Using i386 5.0 release, installed gnome and chromium from packages.
Chromium dumps core rather frequently.
Any help would be appreciated.
The following is gdb output:
GNU gdb 6.3
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public
On 09/19/11 13:58, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Paolo Reyes Balleza
paolo.ball...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I was wondering if there's an equivalent in OpenBSD of tp_smapi/hdaps
battery control hdd protection.
man apm
man systat
man sysctl
$ apm
Battery state
Hello all,
I was wondering if there's an equivalent in OpenBSD of tp_smapi/hdaps
battery control hdd protection.
Using i386-4.9-release on Thinkpad T60.
TIA,
Paolo
On 09/06/11 22:44, jirib wrote:
On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 10:27:22 -0400
Daniel Villarrealyclwebmas...@gmail.com wrote:
I consider the following to be essential reading for beginning OpenBSD
users...
Absolute FreeBSD, 2nd Edition information by Michael W. Lucas...
Hello all,
Running amd64 4.8-stable firewall with NAT load-balancing outgoing
connections to 2 ISPs.
My issue is that sometimes ftp works and sometimes doesn't on the load
balancing setup. If I use the uplinks individually, then ftp works
without a hitch. Other types of traffic work fine AFAICT
Manila, Philippines.
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 09:43 +0800, Tito Mari Francis EscaC1o wrote:
I'm from Manila, Philippines
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Mateusz Gierblinski
mateusz.gierblin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi misc@
I'm just wondering. Where are you OpenBSD users from?
I'm from
Video playback is where I've had the most problems. NTFS support is read
only so as long as you're not dual booting I don't see this as a
problem.
Setting it up for the first time was a PITA but a good learning
experience though.
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 13:59 +0200, Jean-Francois wrote:
Hello
is 192.0.2.1/25 and the address being modified is
10.0.0.130, then the resulting address will be 192.0.2.2.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html
--
Calomel @ https://calomel.org
Open Source Research and Reference
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 11:41:43AM -0400, Paolo Reyes Balleza
, Jun 05, 2010 at 11:41:43AM -0400, Paolo Reyes Balleza wrote:
Hello all,
I was using pf's (OBSD 4.6) binat for openvpn purposes with
192.168.0.0/24 binatted to 192.0.2.0/24 since I can't renumber the local
LAN to avoid the overlap.
This doesn't work with current:
match on tun0 from
Hello all,
I was using pf's (OBSD 4.6) binat for openvpn purposes with
192.168.0.0/24 binatted to 192.0.2.0/24 since I can't renumber the local
LAN to avoid the overlap.
This doesn't work with current:
match on tun0 from 192.168.0.0/24 to any binat-to 192.0.2.0/24
for the entire subnet any more.
10 matches
Mail list logo
