On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 14:32 -0200, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
> When you use UDP, you're seeing the results on the client or in the server ?
>
> iperf uses busy-waiting to implement flow-control in UDP, so basically
> if you specify an absurd rate transfer, the client will try to deliver
> at
Hi all,
back again trying to debug causes of bad performances in my lab's
network.
I tried to place two boxes behind a Cisco router (no information on
model, sorry), the first with OpenBSD 4.6 and the second one with Linux
Ubuntu 9.04.
I used iperf to measure bandwidth, in particular the two box
Il 06/02/10 19:43, Claudio Jeker ha scritto:
Thank you for the clear answer. Anyway, trying to act on tcp.sendspace
isn't affecting the upload capabilities of my OpenBSD server.
I tried downloading a file through httpd, via ftp but results are
still disappointing: 60-70 kbp
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 11:37:11 +0100 (GMT+01:00)
Vincent Tamet wrote:
> Hi, by the way strange mac-adresse, oui search show a cisco systems
> mac one...
> > > Just logged through ssh on the server, ifconfig reports:
> > >
> > > re0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> > > lladdr 00:b0:c2:02:5e:a0
> > >
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 19:43:54 +0100
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > >> Thank you for the clear answer. Anyway, trying to act on
> > >> tcp.sendspace isn't affecting the upload capabilities of my
> > >> OpenBSD server. I tried downloading a file through httpd, via
> > >> ftp but results are still disappoin
Il 06/02/10 18:45, James Peltier ha scritto:
> Have you tried another network card, like an Intel (em) based
> card? The Realtek cards have, at least in the past, been poor performers for
> me.
> __
I have only available another eth
Il 06/02/10 17:33, Kenneth R Westerback ha scritto:
> Optimally you now need to check what the switch port is
> configured/negotiated to. e.g. if it has ended up in 10/half you
> have a problem. Ditto for the connections for the other device.
>
> If you have no access to the switch you can try eve
Il 06/02/10 15:12, Claudio Jeker ha scritto:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 01:27:12PM +0100, Sebastiano Pomata wrote:
>> Il 06/02/10 03:55, Stuart Henderson ha scritto:
>>>> I really can understand this, for the sake of system portability and so
>>>> on. Anyway, I real
Il 06/02/10 15:12, Claudio Jeker ha scritto:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 01:27:12PM +0100, Sebastiano Pomata wrote:
>> Il 06/02/10 03:55, Stuart Henderson ha scritto:
>>>> I really can understand this, for the sake of system portability and so
>>>> on. Anyway, I real
Il 06/02/10 03:55, Stuart Henderson ha scritto:
>> I really can understand this, for the sake of system portability and so
>> on. Anyway, I really hardly understand why, without touching any of the
>> default settings, download rate from every server would never overcome
>> the value of 400 kB/s. I
Il 05/02/10 16:11, Ted Unangst ha scritto:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Ivo Chutkin wrote:
>> I was about to post the same topic here.
>> I observe 250K/s on any OpenBSD server in my network, versions 4.2, 4.4, 4.5
>> and 4.6, various hardware, using wget -O /dev/null
>> I can start the same
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:39:03 +0100
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 08:59:44AM +0100, Sebastiano Pomata wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 02:05:49 + (UTC)
> > Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > > On 2010-02-04, Sebastiano Pomata
> > > wrote:
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 02:05:49 + (UTC)
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2010-02-04, Sebastiano Pomata wrote:
> > As doublechecking, I tried with another fast server inside the wan
> > network of our academy, and I'm getting almost the same results
> > (while absolute
lues are
almost the same I edited), still not having clear why on default
OpenBSD the transfer rates are so low.
thank you all
Il 04/02/2010 21.36, Jean-Francois ha scritto:
> Le jeudi 04 fivrier 2010 20:00:54, Sebastiano Pomata a icrit :
>> If I may ask, I post to the list this questi
If I may ask, I post to the list this question (I have no purpose on
creating flames/trolls/os wars, just for my personal knowledge).
On the same box (Core 2 Duo, Realtek Gigabit ethernet) I've performed
today this simple test, downloading a big file from wu-wien FTP site
(it's one of OpenBSD main
Il 20/01/10 18:18, MERIGHI Marcus ha scritto:
> Hello Sebastiano,
>
> I once got it going by adding the failed component to dev as a spare
> (raidctl -a component dev). After rebooting the component was not a
> spare anymore but turned to the live component (automagically
> recognised?!) again, w
Il 21/01/10 01:38, Robert ha scritto:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:31:58 +0100
> Sebastiano Pomata wrote:
>
>> I can't understand how to get the latest version of trac from the
>> ports. I downloaded just today the whole ports tree for OpenBSD, but I
>> can only
I can't understand how to get the latest version of trac from the
ports. I downloaded just today the whole ports tree for OpenBSD, but I
can only find trac version 0.11.4, while openports.se states that
there's a 0.11.6 port version.
Where can I find it? I thought that connecting through AnonCVS t
In the man page it says that after a failure, you can issue "raidctl
-R /dev/faileddisk raid0" and it will begin reconstruction.
But in my case it exits almost immediately, freezing the system.
A parity rewrite neither can be done, since it exits giving an ioctl
failure (disk is shown as failed s
Thank you. Feel like a newbie (and maybe I am), but in ports/www I
didn't found anything, and google wasn't more helpful
Il 18/01/10 23:16, Stuart Henderson ha scritto:
> On 2010-01-18, Sebastiano Pomata wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm getting stuck trying
Til now, I managed to build php5-core and php5-extensions and they
seem to work.
Thank you
Il 18/01/2010 15.47, Robert Nagy ha scritto:
> Hi
>
> Those packages are built for our in tree apache.
>
> You can try to modify core/Makefile and extensions/Makefile
> to point to apache2's apxs and not
Hi,
I'm getting stuck trying to obtain mod_dav_svn. I'm compiling
subversion from the ports tree (version 1.6.1), the flavor is the
default so it should come with apache2 support, then I install the
package normally but no trace of dav_svn.so file.
How can I specify the correct path to apxs2 (tho
After installing the package, pkg_add suggests to run the trac
standalone server, so I think I will stick with it for trac, while
keeping apache chrooted for other websites.
I think my trac project it's simple enough that I don't need FastCGI
option
Thank you
Il 16/01/2010 15.31, Stuart Henderso
23 matches
Mail list logo
