On 10/25/07, Tom Van Looy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you forgot to count power savings here?
Theo de Raadt wrote:
And when physical servers cost less than some vmware licenses
Then it is even more dumb to defend such stupid practices.
Some but not all. If you buy a Dell
On 10/26/07, Matt Rowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some but not all. If you buy a Dell 2950 quad and load it up with 8
Gig. You can spend $500 on an ESX 3i license and run 10 - 15 512 MB
OpenBSD single processor VMs. The difference here is that you can
max out the duty cycle on the box
Noticed that the X11 install packages are no longer being built for i386 on
a daily basis.
Is there another tree that might have these or shold I just use the built
ones from 4.1 ?
Cheers.
On 3/2/07, Joseph C. Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
Nick Holland wrote:
exactly.
This idea of using VMware (or similar) to host a firewall that
protects the host operating system is something I find somewhere
between amusing (because its silly) and scary
On 2/28/07, Guido Tschakert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
i am forced to use windows at work and am trying to get a vmware openbsd
VM to recognize the non-virtual interfaces, so as to have openbsd as the
router for the windows system. this is using the free vmplayer
On 2/28/07, Christian Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subcommander l0r3zz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I build any package that needs the latest release of gettext,
gettext
blows up on the final install from the built package...
Somebody else also reported this to me. There's
On 2/28/07, Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guido Tschakert wrote:
...
Hi,
yes finally you must go outside, this is done with the bridged
interface.
The question is (I don't have the complete answer, but a strange
feeling):
How secure is your windows with a network interface
All,
I'm making a Vmware Virtual Appliance using OpenBSD so one can leverage
goodies like pf, bgpd, ipsec, carp, etc in the
VM universe. What should I use to create the few config web pages (these
can be easily turned off once configuration is
complete. I'd like to use something that works with
and can only see the pcn0 interface under the VM (which is 3.8-release,
btw) after following the suggestions contained therein. any clues about
getting the VM to recognize the real physical interfaces would be great.
Unfortunately there is no way to get at the actual physical nics from a
Hi all,
When I build any package that needs the latest release of gettext, gettext
blows up on the final install from the built package...
this is current Feb 24...
# gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-unknown-openbsd4.1/3.3.5/specs
Configured with:
Thread model: single
gcc version
Is it possible to build and maintain multiple source trees using a single
platform?
In otherwords, I have an OBSD build hosts that runs say a stable release
(with the occasional patch) but
I want to build some different kernels and userlands for different
platforms. I know how to handle the
Greetz,
What do people use to do power management on their thinkpads?
I've google openbsd.org and can't seem to find any tools that work on the
desktop.
I run Gnome and it seems that i want gnome-power, but it doesn't seem to be
incuded in the pors tree.
I'm mostly interested in knowing how much
Well, I need this too, if you are trying to compile something like L4 (to
use OpenBSD as a development environment for embedded systems that don't use
the OpenBSD kernel) you need a separate binutils, for example, to build
Kenge (An L4:pistachio development environment) you need the gnu nm and ld
I got it in my mind that I would use OpenBSD as my development system to do
L$ (Microkernel ) work.
But I'm having a problem with the binutils tools. Fisrst I needed the GNU
nm utility (because the SCons environment executes an nm --radix=d varient
). Now I'm having problems with the linker. I
If anyone out there is running OpenBSD 3.8 or current with X-windows on any
of the above
could you let me know? I've searched the archives and the laptop pages and
don't see any mention
of these particular models. I'd like to make sure I can run OpenBSD before I
buy.
This came across security focus and I haven't seen it mentioned here.
THey claim 3.8 is vulnerable, anybody know anything?
l0r3zz
06.4.12 CVE: CVE-2006-0381
Platform: BSD
Title: OpenBSD PF IP Fragment Remote Denial Of Service
Description: PF is a packet filtering package that is integrated
16 matches
Mail list logo
