Re: IKEv2: CHILD_SA is not created

Hi! Not only Cisco ASA. Checkpoint, Fortinet, Juniper only support single set of subnets per CHILD_SA too. https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/Checkpoint https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/Fortinet https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/Juniper

Re: 10Gbit network work only 1Gbit

): Hrvoje Popovski ezt írta (időpont: 2021. febr. 26., P, 9:16): > On 26.2.2021. 9:00, csszep wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I miss something , or veb(4) ifconfig bits not yet commited ? > > > > OpenBSD 6.9-beta (GENERIC.MP) #358: Wed Feb 24 17:11:53 MST 2021 > >

Re: 10Gbit network work only 1Gbit

Hi! I miss something , or veb(4) ifconfig bits not yet commited ? OpenBSD 6.9-beta (GENERIC.MP) #358: Wed Feb 24 17:11:53 MST 2021 dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP ifconfig veb0 create ifconfig: SIOCIFCREATE: Invalid argument Hrvoje Popovski ezt

Re: Virtualbox vs latest snapshot

Yes with pure sw virtualization. With hardware virtualization enabled (vt-x,amd-v) not do it, and amd64 guests recommends hw virtualization. Anyway thanks, for the answers., i just want to know if i only have a problem. Thx csszep 2018-04-10 12:58 GMT+02:00 Kevin Chadwick <m8il1i...@gmail.

Re: Virtualbox vs latest snapshot

Hi! I'm using Virtualbox for years with OpenBSD guest without any serious issue. But of course maybe it's a Virtualbox bug. thx csszep 2018-04-10 11:51 GMT+02:00 Kevin Chadwick <m8il1i...@gmail.com>: > On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 10:50:27 +0200 > > > > There is a similar e

Virtualbox vs latest snapshot

Hi! I installed the latest 04.10 snapshot, the install procedure went fine, but after reboot the VM stucks at endless boot loop . It prints only the "booting hda0:/bsd" line.. before reboot The 04.03 snapshot works fine. There is a similar experience for someone with Virtualbox 5.2.8?

Re: OSPF over gif on top of IPsec transport -current

Hi! Will this fix be commit before 6.3 release? Thx csszep David Gwynne <d...@openbsd.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2018. márc. 13., K 23:41): > > > On 10 Mar 2018, at 08:01, Remi Locherer <remi.loche...@relo.ch> wrote: > > > > > > With below diff the setu

Re: OpenBSD as an IKEv2 IPsec client with L/P authent

4281 packets for which no TDB was found I disabled it, and Strongswan works! openbsdvm1# sysctl net.inet.esp.enable=0 net.inet.esp.enable: 1 -> 0 openbsdvm1# sysctl net.inet.esp.udpencap=0 net.inet.esp.udpencap: 1 -> 0 Thx Csszep 2018-02-23 10:29 GMT+01:00 csszep <css...@gmail.co

Re: OpenBSD as an IKEv2 IPsec client with L/P authent

vm1 charon: 05[ESP]0: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0A.. Feb 23 11:25:58 openbsdvm1 charon: 05[ESP] padding length = 10, next header = 4 I'm here now Thx csszep 2018-02-22 12:50 GMT+01:00 Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org>: > On 2018/02/22 0

iked alternate location for the control socket?

Hello! In ikectl there is a "-s socket" parameter to change the control socket location. But in iked the "-s" parameter is missing, so you cannot change the socket location. This is not implemented in iked? It is useful if run two iked process in different rdomain. Thx csszep

ospfd 224.0.0.5: Can't assign requested address on rdomain 2

Hello! I created a simple ospf test lab, but i ran into the following error: The setup: ospfd.conf rdomain 2 area 0.0.0.0 { interface vio2 } route -T2 -n show Routing tables Internet: DestinationGatewayFlags Refs Use Mtu Prio Iface default

Re: npppd with tun interface not work on i386?

Thx It works as expected. 2013/1/31 YASUOKA Masahiko yasu...@yasuoka.net: Hi, On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 20:20:24 +0100 csszep css...@gmail.com wrote: I tried to start npppd with the default config with tun0 interface on my Alix board: I get the following error message: # npppd -d 2013-01

npppd with tun interface not work on i386?

(86722b7d28b15b50.a) swap on wd0b dump on wd0b clock: unknown CMOS layout thx csszep

Re: current snapshot pipex kernel panic

Thank you! It works as expected. Otherwise the mppe no option is missing from the manual page. 2012/9/26 YASUOKA Masahiko yasu...@yasuoka.net: Hello, On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:16:12 +0200 csszep css...@gmail.com wrote: I wanted to try a simple npppd setup and i got a panic. I'm looking

Re: ciss(4) write very slow w/o bbwc

is acceptable for me. The raw performace (eg. newfs) is not so important. Thx csszep 2012/5/29 Andreas Bartelt o...@bartula.de: Hello, On 05/29/12 17:28, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 03:48:02PM +0200, csszep wrote: Hi! So i tested the ciss performance

ciss(4) write very slow w/o bbwc

? My C and OpenBSD internals knowledge is not enough for this task. PS: Yes i know, my english is terrible. thx csszep

Re: ciss(4) write very slow w/o bbwc

Ok, but i installed Linux (Debian 6) and there is no performance degradation. I will install NetBSD too, and i will do a test. The commit does not turn on the cache, it enable tagged queing if i understand it well. thx csszep 2012/5/29 Jonathan Gray j...@jsg.id.au: I don't think that commit

Re: ciss(4) write very slow w/o bbwc

Hi! So i tested the ciss performance with Openbsd 5.1 and Netbsd 5.1.2 and the numbers are the same. :( approx 13Mbyte/s write with dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rsd1c bs=1m count=500 But why Linux is four times faster (approx 40Mbyte/s)? thx csszep 2012/5/29 csszep css...@gmail.com: Ok, but i

virtual crossover link with vether(4) patch integration?

Hi! Is there any news about this patch integration? http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=129622196824469w=2 And i'm sorry to bother you... thx Csszep