Another vmd sanity check recommendation / WAS: "vmctl stop" causing disk image corruption with OpenBSD 6.2-stable VM

process were also flagged for fsck at reboot of the VMs. Perhaps another sanity check for the to-do list... don't start vmd if it is already running? Yours truly, Breen From: Mike Larkin <mlar...@azathoth.net> Sent: February 3, 2018 4:49 PM To: openbsd2

Re: "vmctl stop" causing disk image corruption with OpenBSD 6.2-stable VM

a vmd sanity check to avoid a VM disk image being loaded by more than one VM simultaneously? Providing a patch is outside my skill set, unfortunately. Yours truly, Breen From: Mike Larkin <mlar...@azathoth.net> Sent: February 1, 2018 10:21 PM To: openb

"vmctl stop" causing disk image corruption with OpenBSD 6.2-stable VM

I've been testing out vmd with a single OpenBSD VM for about a week. Running "vmctl stop 1" from the vmd host often causes the VM on reboot to output "WARNING: / was not properly unmounted", or in some cases the VM will loop infinitely at the boot prompt. I can avoid disk image corruption by

Installed 5.7/amd64, now No acceptable DHCPOFFERS received.

I decided that tonight was the time to upgrade my home router from OpenBSD 5.2/amd64. I performed a new install of 5.7/amd64. During the install, a DHCP lease could not be obtained on em0 from my ISP. On first boot it gave me No acceptable DHCPOFFERS received. I flashed the latest BIOS and

Re: Why are there no PKG_PATH defaults?

| -Original Message- | From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On | Behalf Of openda...@hushmail.com | Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 6:01 AM | Subject: Why are there no PKG_PATH defaults? ... | Expanding on the whole |

Re: PDF FAQ [Was: Donations to OpenBSD]

| I've seen this before. It has never helped OpenBSD. I'll stop short of calling | the OP a troll, but boy, what an amazing distraction. I wonder who funds | him. Yep, if it's such a great idea then why aren't these suggestion makers doing it? The answer is that it would be a colossal waste

Re: For Google+ users: BSD community

Also, the strictly OpenBSD community on G+: https://plus.google.com/communities/113634135604793474364 | -Original Message- | From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On | Behalf Of Tony Sidaway | Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 6:18 AM | To: OpenBSD misc | Subject: For

Re: QEMU CPU cores not showing up

| -Original Message- | From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On | Behalf Of Bruno Delbono | Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 10:48 AM | To: Theo de Raadt | Cc: misc@openbsd.org; mlar...@azathoth.net | Subject: Re: QEMU CPU cores not showing up | Useless crying

Supported PCI express audio devices?

Hi, I need to get audio support working with one of Supermicro's Atom mainboards. These do not have onboard sound, but do have one free PCI express slot. This machine will replace an aging Windows XP audio logger at our local community radio station. I'm not having much luck determining if

Re: PF altq and limiting traffic among multiple interfaces

| -Original Message- | From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On | Behalf Of Stuart Henderson | Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 7:47 AM | To: misc@openbsd.org | Subject: Re: PF altq and limiting traffic among multiple interfaces | | On 2012-11-21, openbsd2012

Re: Hunning HA over multiple ARCH's

If you really find that you are considering going Soekris, you might also want to consider one of these: http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/5015/SYS-5015A-EHF-D525.cfm Unless you need the second PCI-E slot that the net6501 offers. I don't see much advantage to the marginally smaller

Re: softraid to encrypt _AND_ raid?

| -Original Message- | Alexis de BRUYN [Mailinglists] wrote | Try that : | wd0a wd1a are RAID partitions. | bioctl -c 1 -l wd0a,wd1a softraid0 | Create a RAID partition on the new raid device sd0. | bioctl -c C -r 8192 -l /dev/sd0d softraid0 | sd1 is your raid+crypto device. | |

Re: OpenBSD Cloud Offerings

| -Original Message- | Subject: OpenBSD Cloud Offerings | | I was wondering if anyone had any experience with reputable cloud | providers that currently offer OpenBSD 5.2. | | I was able to find out some information based on the OpenBSD Journal | posting from Sunday, February 13, 2011

Re: PF altq and limiting traffic among multiple interfaces

for the insight! Breen -Original Message- From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of Stuart Henderson Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 7:47 AM To: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: PF altq and limiting traffic among multiple interfaces On 2012-11-21, openbsd2012

Re: PF altq and limiting traffic among multiple interfaces

Mikolaj, Before I get into this, do you really have a connection where your total bandwidth in both directions is pooled? If so you will need to modify my approach somewhat, as I've not been in that situation myself. For reference, my full rule set for my home network appears at the end of

Parent-child cbq borrow irregularity with pf

Hello list members. Long time no see. Law school hasn't been kind to my free time. I have noticed this unexpected behavior in pf since OpenBSD 5.0-release on various amd64 boxes. I am using cbq in pf to throttle outbound traffic on both interfaces of my home router. Full pf rule set and dmesg