On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Tor Houghton wrote:
> From: Tor Houghton
> To: Ryan McBride
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:06:25
> Subject: Re: (Perhaps?) dumb pf question relating to tables
> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 05:32:27PM +
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 05:32:27PM +0900, Ryan McBride wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 01:45:16PM +0100, Tor Houghton wrote:
> > May I ask whether or not "per user" ownership (or permission to update) a
> > table is/will be possible?
> >
> > I am pondering the best mechanism for a non-root proce
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 01:45:16PM +0100, Tor Houghton wrote:
> May I ask whether or not "per user" ownership (or permission to update) a
> table is/will be possible?
>
> I am pondering the best mechanism for a non-root process to add/remove
> addresses to a table.
You can look at sysutils/table
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 13:45, Tor Houghton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> May I ask whether or not "per user" ownership (or permission to update) a
> table is/will be possible?
>
> I am pondering the best mechanism for a non-root process to add/remove
> addresses to a table.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Tor
>
Yo
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 01:45:16PM +0100, Tor Houghton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> May I ask whether or not "per user" ownership (or permission to update) a
> table is/will be possible?
>
> I am pondering the best mechanism for a non-root process to add/remove
> addresses to a table.
Privilege separati
Hello,
May I ask whether or not "per user" ownership (or permission to update) a
table is/will be possible?
I am pondering the best mechanism for a non-root process to add/remove
addresses to a table.
Kind regards,
Tor
6 matches
Mail list logo
