Re: [unclassified] Re: uEagle DSL chipset

2006-08-15 Thread Chris 'Xenon' Hanson
Craig Skinner wrote: On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 10:48:55PM -0400, Chris Zakelj wrote: PPPoA is in some ways, preferable, since you don't have the MTU issue of PPPoE. Much better. It is helpful to include such details ;) I didn't think it was important, since I wasn't asking for help. I'm

Re: [unclassified] Re: uEagle DSL chipset

2006-08-14 Thread Chris Zakelj
Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote: Chris Zakelj wrote: Why not just a plain old DSL/10BaseT bridge and pppoe(8)? I agree that it'd be great to have hardware plugged comfortably inside the system and one less piece hanging off the power strip, but canacar@ and crew have done an incredible job on it,

Re: [unclassified] Re: uEagle DSL chipset

2006-08-14 Thread Rod.. Whitworth
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:48:55 -0400, Chris Zakelj wrote: Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote: Chris Zakelj wrote: Why not just a plain old DSL/10BaseT bridge and pppoe(8)? I agree that it'd be great to have hardware plugged comfortably inside the system and one less piece hanging off the power strip,

Re: [unclassified] Re: uEagle DSL chipset

2006-08-14 Thread Craig Skinner
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 10:48:55PM -0400, Chris Zakelj wrote: PPPoA is in some ways, preferable, since you don't have the MTU issue of PPPoE. Much better. It is helpful to include such details ;) At the office where I worked roughly three years ago, we had a setup where the external