Hi,
On Sat, 14.06.2008 at 01:39:29 +0200, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope. That is not the problem. The main issues is that a full view will
need a lot of memory for the sysctl. This memory needs to be available as
real memory because it is wired into the kernel. If you run bgpd
* Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-14 11:29]:
Would it be possible to walk along the live table, without copying the
table, or would the continuous stream of route inserts and deletes lead
to a corrupted view and/or access to the wrong parts of the system's
memory (which must to be
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-14 11:29]:
Would it be possible to walk along the live table, without copying the
table, or would the continuous stream of route inserts and deletes lead
to a corrupted view
* David Higgs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-15 01:59]:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-14 11:29]:
Would it be possible to walk along the live table, without copying the
table, or would the continuous stream of
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* David Higgs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-15 01:59]:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-14 11:29]:
Would it be possible to walk along the
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:55:52PM -0400, David Higgs wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* David Higgs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-15 01:59]:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Toni Mueller [EMAIL
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as of today (I didn't notice it earlier), I see this problem on one of
my machines:
# netstat -rnf inet
netstat: sysctl of routing table: Cannot allocate memory
netstat -r dumps the routing table by calling sysctl()
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 04:20:45PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as of today (I didn't notice it earlier), I see this problem on one of
my machines:
# netstat -rnf inet
netstat: sysctl of routing table: Cannot
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Nope. That is not the problem. The main issues is that a full view will
need a lot of memory for the sysctl. This memory needs to be available as
real memory because it is wired into the kernel. If you run bgpd with
Hi,
as of today (I didn't notice it earlier), I see this problem on one of
my machines:
# netstat -rnf inet
netstat: sysctl of routing table: Cannot allocate memory
This machine receives two full feeds @ ~255k routes each.
Any idea about how to combat this, please?
Kind regards,
--Toni++
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:47:25AM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
Hi,
as of today (I didn't notice it earlier), I see this problem on one of
my machines:
# netstat -rnf inet
netstat: sysctl of routing table: Cannot allocate memory
This machine receives two full feeds @ ~255k routes each.
11 matches
Mail list logo
