On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 12:53:51AM -0500, Andrew Daugherity wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Mike Larkin wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 01:04:40AM -0500, Andrew Daugherity wrote:
> > >
> > > boot> hd0a:/bsd.61
> > > cannot open hd0a:/etc/random.seed: No
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 01:04:40AM -0500, Andrew Daugherity wrote:
> >
> > boot> hd0a:/bsd.61
> > cannot open hd0a:/etc/random.seed: No such file or directory
> > booting hd0a:/bsd.61:
Building your own kernel (on your fast machine with lots of memory),
stripped of every driver your machine doesn't have, can get you a bit
further on memory constrained machines. This gets you into
unsupported land, but if you want support you're probably best of
spending a nickel and getting a
A few quick tests on 6.1-i386 in a VM showed that 20M seems to be minimum
now, at 17-19M disk setup would segfault late in the installation and at
16M em0 couldn't get TX stuff allocated, so that failed even earlier.
2017-09-01 9:43 GMT+02:00 Mike Larkin :
> On Thu, Aug
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:57:40PM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 01:04:40AM -0500, Andrew Daugherity wrote:
> > I recently dug out of the closet my old IBM PS/2E, which had served as
> > my firewall box from 2000ish-06, and was in fact the very first
> > machine I ever
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 01:04:40AM -0500, Andrew Daugherity wrote:
> I recently dug out of the closet my old IBM PS/2E, which had served as
> my firewall box from 2000ish-06, and was in fact the very first
> machine I ever installed OpenBSD on, to see if it still worked
> properly. It did (after
I recently dug out of the closet my old IBM PS/2E, which had served as
my firewall box from 2000ish-06, and was in fact the very first
machine I ever installed OpenBSD on, to see if it still worked
properly. It did (after changing the CMOS battery), but booted into
OpenBSD 4.1... yeah, just a
7 matches
Mail list logo