Just to confirm that the problem here is just the usb3 copy machine producing
faulty copies.
-- Daniele Bonini
Apr 20, 2023 15:51:56 Daniele B. :
> Problem almost solved:
>
> I changed from a usb3 copy machine to a usb2 copy machine and
> the disk was copied successful.
>
> Actually I have
Problem almost solved:
I changed from a usb3 copy machine to a usb2 copy machine and
the disk was copied successful.
Actually I have two hypotesis:
1) the source disk has some physical problems but this
doesn't explain why fsck_ffs doesn't detect any failure.
2) As I'm using 3.5'' disks too,
UPDATE:
Fixed that disk I decided to rebooted to test it one more time
before starting the backup again from that.
It seems not my day:
BAD SUPER BLOCK: VALUES IN SUPER BLOCK DISAGREE WITH THOSE IN LAST
ALTERNATE
RUN fsck_ffs MANUALLY
like before to fix it..
-- Daniele Bonini
>
> Hello,
Hello,
(7.2 patched till 72-024)
I just came across the moment to do my backups and testing
the resulting two backup disks the result was the same for both:
BAD SUPER BLOCK: VALUES IN SUPER BLOCK DISAGREE WITH THOSE IN LAST
ALTERNATE
RUN fsck_ffs MANUALLY
After the third time I redid the
4 matches
Mail list logo
