On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 10:33:02AM -0700, Jon wrote:
o;?
I am referring to the old hardware dumb terminals, which had the vt320
standards etc. A client of mine uses a legacy database application
that absolutely requires such an emulator (and is using Accuterm right
now). A Free Software
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 06:56:25PM +, Grumpy wrote:
The best VT220 emulator is the underappreciated xterm(1).
The s/underappreciated/under appreciated terminal know as xterm,
would be more appreciated if they modernized it a little... Anyone who
peddles a terminal emulator without
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o;?
I am referring to the old hardware dumb terminals, which had the vt320
standards etc. A client of mine uses a legacy database application
that absolutely requires such an emulator (and is using Accuterm right
now). A Free
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 10:33:02AM -0700, Jon wrote:
o;?
I am referring to the old hardware dumb terminals, which had the vt320
standards etc. A client of mine uses a legacy database application
Ehh, it's a bit rewriting history to call the vt line dumb
terminals. vt terminals were considered
Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am referring to the old hardware dumb terminals, which had the vt320
standards etc. A client of mine uses a legacy database application
that absolutely requires such an emulator (and is using Accuterm right
The best VT220 emulator is the underappreciated
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
The best VT220 emulator is the underappreciated xterm(1).
The s/underappreciated/under appreciated terminal know as xterm, would be
more appreciated if they modernized it a little... Anyone who peddles a
terminal emulator without pseudo transparency should be
The best VT220 emulator is the underappreciated xterm(1).
The s/underappreciated/under appreciated terminal know as xterm,
would be more appreciated if they modernized it a little... Anyone who
peddles a terminal emulator without pseudo transparency should be
locked up indefinitely. :-)
gnome-terminal, and compiz with the blur effect heavily applied, no
scrollbar and window decorations which cast large shadows and match the
transparency and color of your terminal atop a very busy desktop
background, is where it's at.
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 11:42 -0700, Unix Fan wrote:
o;?
I am referring to the old hardware dumb terminals, which had the vt320
standards etc. A client of mine uses a legacy database application
that absolutely requires such an emulator (and is using Accuterm right
now). A Free Software program that emulates these well enough and runs
on GNU or BSD
Any that support the status line where the application thinks there is
an 80x24 terminal and some meta character tells the terminal to display
text after it in the status line, which looks like a 25th line below
the 80x24 terminal?
Screen?
On 6/5/08, Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any that support the status line where the application thinks there is
an 80x24 terminal and some meta character tells the terminal to display
text after it in the status line, which looks like a 25th line below
the 80x24 terminal?
--
Sent
11 matches
Mail list logo
