Re: BCM5719/20 or I350

2014-01-07 Thread Hrvoje Popovski
On 7.1.2014. 13:27, mxb wrote: > > This is a pair of CARP-nodes (2x Dell R620 ). Nodes are connected with > cross-over, trunk to trunk (trunk of 2x I350 per node). > No vlans. > > tcpbench from the base; PF used a lot, but with "pass quick on trunk0 keep > state”: > > Conn: 1 Mbps: 926.

Re: BCM5719/20 or I350

2014-01-07 Thread mxb
This is a pair of CARP-nodes (2x Dell R620 ). Nodes are connected with cross-over, trunk to trunk (trunk of 2x I350 per node). No vlans. tcpbench from the base; PF used a lot, but with "pass quick on trunk0 keep state”: Conn: 1 Mbps: 926.569 Peak Mbps: 939.483 Avg Mbps: 926.569

Re: BCM5719/20 or I350

2014-01-06 Thread Hrvoje Popovski
On 5.1.2014. 17:10, mxb wrote: > > I have I350 on several machines and haven’t seen any problems. > Do you have vlans or trunk on I350? Could you share some numbers like bps or pps? Tnx for info.

Re: BCM5719/20 or I350

2014-01-05 Thread mxb
I have I350 on several machines and haven’t seen any problems. On 5 jan 2014, at 12:18, Hrvoje Popovski wrote: > Hello, > > I need to upgrade my OpenBSD firewalls and have chance to buy HP DL360p > G8 or Supermicro 5017R-WRF. Which card is better or more stable for > firewalling BCM5719/20 or

BCM5719/20 or I350

2014-01-05 Thread Hrvoje Popovski
Hello, I need to upgrade my OpenBSD firewalls and have chance to buy HP DL360p G8 or Supermicro 5017R-WRF. Which card is better or more stable for firewalling BCM5719/20 or Intel I350? I see that I350 doesn't support VLAN_HWTAGGING nor TX CSUM's and it seems that is quite different from older em c