Yes, it does make some sense. I'm going to have to take a deeper dive into
understanding routing domains and virtual routing tables. I noticed a good
article on packetmischief.ca which seems to provide a good overview. Thanks
again for your help.
Matt
On Mar 8, 2016 2:17 AM, "Claudio Jeker"
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:29:48AM -0500, Matt Schwartz wrote:
> Thank you much, Claudio! That was the ticket. I had put my depend on mpe0
> in the wrong place. I was mostly using your mpls example. Dumb questions:
> Why do you not create a default route in rdomain 1 on the 2nd PE in your
> mpls
Thank you much, Claudio! That was the ticket. I had put my depend on mpe0
in the wrong place. I was mostly using your mpls example. Dumb questions:
Why do you not create a default route in rdomain 1 on the 2nd PE in your
mpls example network? Why do you not have network 0.0.0.0/0 on the 2nd PE?
On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 10:10:37PM -0500, Matt Schwartz wrote:
> Hello @misc,
>
> I am running OpenBSD 5.8 release and I am finding that BGPD is not adding
> routes. When I type bgpctl show rib, I don't see any routes added. Did I
> goof up this configuration? Below are my bgpd.c
Hello @misc,
I am running OpenBSD 5.8 release and I am finding that BGPD is not adding
routes. When I type bgpctl show rib, I don't see any routes added. Did I
goof up this configuration? Below are my bgpd.conf files. I do not even see
any routes added when I run route -T1 show. I have
5 matches
Mail list logo