Hello
I am trying to understand the behavior of BGPD. My setup is as below I'm
trying to understand when
BGPD will withdraw a route of a local interface.
/etc/hostname.vether0
inet 192.0.2.1 255.255.255.255
/etc/bgpd.conf
myas="65003"
AS $myas
router-id 1.0.0.1
network inet connected
fib-update
* frantisek holop [2009-08-31 20:27]:
> hi there,
>
> i found this interesting article
> http://www.renesys.com/blog/2009/08/staring-into-the-gorge.shtml
>
> i am not a bgp user so i would be grateful if someone
> answered how openbsd's bgpd handles the described problem.
> thanks,
executive su
hi there,
i found this interesting article
http://www.renesys.com/blog/2009/08/staring-into-the-gorge.shtml
i am not a bgp user so i would be grateful if someone
answered how openbsd's bgpd handles the described problem.
thanks,
-f
--
so you think you can tell heaven from hell.
See bgpd.conf(5).
On 2008-09-12, Jens Kassel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I want to create BGP speaker that can give different next-hop address
> for same prefix dependent on the BGP peer.
>
> E.g. for the prefix 10.20.30.40/32 a want to tell peer1 to use next-hop
> 10.0.0.1 and tel
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:48:04 +0700, Jens Kassel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hello,
I want to create BGP speaker that can give different next-hop address
for same prefix dependent on the BGP peer.
E.g. for the prefix 10.20.30.40/32 a want to tell peer1 to use next-hop
10.0.0.1 and tell peer2
Hello,
I want to create BGP speaker that can give different next-hop address
for same prefix dependent on the BGP peer.
E.g. for the prefix 10.20.30.40/32 a want to tell peer1 to use next-hop
10.0.0.1 and tell peer2 to use next-hop 10.0.0.2.
Would this be possible when using BGPD without cod
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
I have a question about BGPD.
It's my bgpd.conf
group "peering AS" {
remote-as
neighbor $peer1 {
descr "Principal"
announce all
local-address $local1
dep
7 matches
Mail list logo
