Hi Misc@,
Could someone elaborate me with this tcpdump I had? After nat-ing,
checksum error shows, on the same packet..
rule 173.home.8/(match) [uid 0, pid 9731] pass in on vlan516:
172.16.33.254.64264 188.255.110.14.51413: S [tcp sum ok]
260322197:260322197(0) win 8192 mss
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Insan Praja SW insan.pr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Misc@,
Could someone elaborate me with this tcpdump I had? After nat-ing, checksum
error shows, on the same packet..
rule 173.home.8/(match) [uid 0, pid 9731] pass in on vlan516:
172.16.33.254.64264
On 11 February 2012 11:00, Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Insan Praja SW insan.pr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Misc@,
Could someone elaborate me with this tcpdump I had? After nat-ing,
checksum
error shows, on the same packet..
rule
On 11 February 2012 09:43, Insan Praja SW insan.pr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Misc@,
Could someone elaborate me with this tcpdump I had? After nat-ing, checksum
error shows, on the same packet..
rule 173.home.8/(match) [uid 0, pid 9731] pass in on vlan516:
172.16.33.254.64264
* Christiano F. Haesbaert haesba...@haesbaert.org [2012-02-11 14:25]:
I think pf is not recalculating the checksum after nating, not sure if
it should, henning ?
ip_output does that unconditionally, and i fixed the bridge to do that too
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS
5 matches
Mail list logo